Ecomorfic structure of the soil macrofauna community from the swamp-meadow biogeocoenosis in natural reservoir "Dnieper-Orilsky"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/bio2019.03.006Keywords:
catena, soil macrofauna, ecomorphs, biogeocoenosis, biodiversityAbstract
The work within the framework of the application of katena approach to characterize the landscape diversity of the natural reserve "Dnieper-Orelsky" made ekomorfic characteristics of soil macrofauna community one of the elements of the katena complex - bog meadow biogeocoenosis. Soil macrofauna community presented a high level of taxonomic and ecological diversity. The study found that, in bog meadow biogeocoenosis which is formed on the meadow-marsh carbonate loamy soil, identified the presence of 59 species of soil macrofauna. The total number of community is 197.5 ind./m2. Ekomorfic community structure is a sensitive indicator of environmental conditions which exist soil invertebrates. Earthworms are presented littered Dendrobaena octaedra, amfibiontnim Eiseniella tetraedra, soil and litter Dendrobaena veneta, soil Aporrectodea caliginosa and Aporrectodea rosea and Norn Octodrilus transpadanus. Cenomorfic community structure indicates its amfitsenotichesky character. The community is dominated by gigrofiles, of Ground form megatrofotsenomorfes. Almost equal ratio of herbivores and saprophages indicates the balance of mineralization and humification processes in the community. As a study of prospects can be considered an extension of the spectrum of ecosystems for research within the catena and define the role of edaphic factors in the formation ekomorficheskoy community structure at the level of individual habitats. soil Aporrectodea caliginosa and Aporrectodea rosea and Norn Octodrilus transpadanus. Cenomorfic community structure indicates its amfitsenotichesky character. The community is dominated by gigrofily, of Ground form megatrofotsenomorfy. Almost equal ratio of herbivores and saprophages indicates the balance of mineralization and humification processes in the community. As a study of prospects can be considered an extension of the spectrum of ecosystems for research within the catena and define the role of edaphic factors in the formation ekomorficheskoy community structure at the level of individual habitats. soil Aporrectodea caliginosa and Aporrectodea rosea and Norn Octodrilus transpadanus. Tsenomorficheskaya community structure indicates its amfitsenotichesky character. The community is dominated by gigrofiles, of Ground form megatrofotsenomorfes. Almost equal ratio of herbivores and saprophages indicates the balance of mineralization and humification processes in the community. As a study of prospects can be considered an extension of the spectrum of ecosystems for research within the catena and define the role of edaphic factors in the formation ecomorfic community structure at the level of individual habitats.
References
Bahnov, V. K., Gamsikov, G. P., Ilin, V.B. (1988). Metodologicheskie i metodicheskie aspektyi pochvovedeni [Methodological and methodic aspects of the pedology]. Novosibirsk (in Russian).
Bushnell, T.M. (1942). Some aspects of the soil catena concept. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 466-476.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1943.036159950007000C0079x
Diduh, Y. P. (2008). Etudes of the phytoecology. Kyiv: Apistey.
Didukh, Ya.P., Chusova, O.O., Olshevska, I.A., Polishchuk, Yu.V. (2015). River valleys as the object of ecological and geobotanical research. Ukr. Bot. J., 415-430.
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj72.05.415
Fridland, V. M. (1972). Struktura pochvennogo pokrova [Structure of the soil cover]. Moscow, Misl (in Russian).
Gennadiev, A. N., Kasimov, N.S. (2004). Lateral migration of the substances and soil and geochemical catenas. Soil Science, 12, 1447-1461.
Gerard, A. G. (1984). Pochvyi i formyi relefa [Soils of forms of relief]. Leningrad, Nedra (in Russian).
Hole, F.D. (1953). Suggested terminology for describing soils as three-dimensional bodies. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc, 131-135.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1953.03615995001700020012x
Kaprus, I. Y. (2011). Comparative analysis of the Collembola faunas within Ukraine territory. Studia Biologica, 5, 3, 135-154.
https://doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0503.166
Karavaeva, N. A. (1982). Zabolachivanie i evolyutsiya pochv [Water logging and soil evolution]. Moscow, Nauka (in Russian).
Karpachevsky, L. O., (2005). Ekologicheskie pochvovoedenie [Ecological soil science]. Moscow, Geos (in Russian).
Katenin, A. E. (1988). The classification of the uneven territory units of the plant cover as an example tundra vegetation. Botanical Journal, 73, 2, 186-197.
Kholod, S.S. (1991). Classification phytocatena slopes. Botanical Journal, 76 (9), 1239-1249.
Kozlovsky, F. I. (2003). Theory and methods of the soil cover investigation. Moscow: GEOS (in Russian).
Mazey, Y. A, Embulaeva, E. A. (2015). Soil testacea community changes along catenas in foreststeppe zone. University proceedings. Volga region. Natural Science. Ecology, 1, 9, 98-114.
Milne, B.T. (1991). Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. In: Turner M.G. and Gardner R.H. (eds), Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology - The Analysis and Interpretation of Landscape Heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, pp. 199-235.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4244-2_9
Milne, G. (1935). Some suggested units for classification and mapping, particularly for East African soils. Soil Research, 183-198.
Mordkovich, V. G. (2013). Zoological diagnostic of the soils: imperatives, function and place in the soil science and pedology. Journal of General Biology, 74, 6, 463-471.
Romanovsky, M. G. (2002). Productivity, stability and biological diversity of plateau forests of the european Russia. Moscow, MGUL.
Urusevskaya, I. S. (1990). Soil catenas of the Non-Black Soil Zone of the RSFSR. Soil Science, 9, 12-26.
Yaalon, D.H. (1971). Soil-Forming Processes in Time and Space. Paleopedology: Origin, Nature and Dating of Paleosols. Israel University Press, Jerusalem, Israel, 29-39.
Zadorozhnaya, G. A., Andrusevych, K.V., Zhukov, O.V., (2018). Soil heterogeneity after recultivation: ecological aspect. Folia Oecologica, 45 (1), 46-52.
https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2018-0005
Zaugolnova, L. B. (2001). Characteristic of the forest phytocatena in subzone of the coniferous-broadleafes forests. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists, 106, 5, 43-51.
Zaugolnova, L. B. (2010). Spatial structure of the biogeocoenotic soil cover. Methodical approaches for ecological assessment of the forest cover in small river basin. Moscow, KMK Scientific Press, 10-19.
Zhukov, A. V., Shatalin, D.B. (2016). Hygrotope and trophotope of the steppe pridniprovie biogeoceonosis as determinants of the earthworms (Lumbricidae) communities β-diversity. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (2), 129-157.
https://doi.org/10.15421/201651
Zhukov, A., Gadorozhnaya, G. (2016). Spatial heterogeneity of mechanical impedance of a typical chernozem: the ecological approach. Ekológia (Bratislava), 35, 263-278.
https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2016-0021
Zhukov, A.V., Kunah, O.N., Novikova, V.A., Ganzha, D.S. (2016). Phytoindication estimation of soil mesopedobionts communities catena and their ecomorphic organization. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (3), 91-117. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15421/201676
Zhukov, O.V. Gubanova, N.L. (2015a). Diversity and dynamics of amphibians in floodplain ecosystems of the Samara river. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology, 23(1), 66-73.
https://doi.org/10.15421/011510
Zhukov, O.V., Gubanova, N.L. (2015b). Dynamic stability of communities of amphibians in short-term-floodedforest ecosystems. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology, 23 (2), 161-171.
https://doi.org/10.15421/011523
Zhukov, O.V., Kunah, O.N., Novikova, V.A. (2016). The functional organisation of the mesopedobionts community of sod pinewood soils on arena of the river Dnepr. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology, 24(1), 26-39.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
