Liberalism as a modern ideology

Authors

  • V. E. Hontar National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
  • S. V. Storozhuk National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog2021.02.012

Abstract

The article differentiates modern socio-political narratives with their inherent speculative ontological and anthropological foundations and the real causes of social transformations of the modern era and shows that the ideological and socio-political foundations of liberalism emerged in the pre-modern era widespread after the invention of printing technology. Through book printing, liberalism opened wide access to information resources and contributed to the important transformation of peoples into nations, uniting historically conditioned social demands of peoples into an ideological core. The uniqueness of liberalism was determined by the collective interests of the active minority, which, using the achievements of information technology revolutions, made efforts to destroy the archaic unjust orders and systems. The struggle against these unjust orders gave an indulgence to uncriticalism, thus contributing to the penetration into the public consciousness of a large number of ideals and norms, which promoted the enslavement of people, disguising it as humanistic tendencies.

References

Afanasyev, A. N. (2010). Aksiologicheskiy podkhod k kontseptsii prav cheloveka [An axiological approach to the concept of human rights]. Uchenyye zapiski [Scholarly notes]. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3 (15).

Bokhenskiy, Yu. (1993). Sto suyeveriy. Kratkiy filosofskiy slovar predrassudkov [One hundred superstitions. A Brief Philosophical Dictionary of Prejudice]. Moscow, Izdatelskaya gruppa «Progress»-«VIA». 187.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Available at: ttp://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_015

Habermas J. (2001). Filosofskyi dyskurs Modernu [The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity]. Kyiv: The Fourth Wave. 424.

Golovin Yu. A.. Kokhanaya O. E. (2016). Kritika liberalnoy ideologii kak kontsepta v paradigme mediaobrazovaniya [Criticism of liberal ideology as a concept in the paradigm of media education]. Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki [Questions of theory and practice of journalism], 5 (2). 314-323.

https://doi.org/10.17150/2308-6203.2016.5(2).314-323

Haidt J. (2016), When and Why Nationalism Beats Globalism, available at: https://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/07/10/when-and-why-nationalism-beats-globalism

Hoyan I., Storozhuk S., Fedyk O., Kryvda N. (2019). Worldview and ideological priorities of modern society: ukrainian and euro-atlantic сontext. Ideology and Education in Post-Soviet Countries, 2 (13). 255-272.

Danylova T. V. (2016). The Desire for Recognition in the Context of Francis Fukuyama's Universal History. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 10. 69-77.

https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i10.87303

Dworkin, Ronald Myles. (2000). Serioznyi pohliad na prava [Taking Rights Seriously]. Kyiv: Osnovy. 519.

Ilin A. A. (2017). Kak tsifrovyye tekhnologii izmenili «Stanok Gutenberga» [How digital technology has changed the Gutenberg Machine]. Istoricheskaya i sotsialno-obrazovatelnaya mysl [Historical and socio-educational thought], 9 (2-2). 161-172.

https://doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2017-9-2/2-161-172

Ishchuk N. V. (2009). Liberalna ideolohiia: obrysy pravoslavnoi krytyky [Liberal ideology: outlines of Orthodox criticism]. Proceedings of the National Aviation University. Filosofiia. Kulturolohiia, 2. 46-49.

The Constitution of Ukraine, available at: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80

Locke, John. (2002). Rozvidka pro liudske rozuminnia [Essay Concerning Human Understanding]: u 4-kh kn. Kharkiv. 152.

MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame Press, 286.

Martianov, V. S. (2017). Politicheskaya ontologiya Moderna: v poiskakh uskolzayushchego bolshinstva [Political Ontology of Modernity: In Search of the Elusive Majority]. Zhurnal politicheskoy filosofii i sotsiologii politiki «Politiya. Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz», 1 (84). 107-126.

https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2017-84-1-107-126

Nozick, R. (1994). The Nature of Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 242.

https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7rwk2

Pinker, Steven. (2012). The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. London: Penguin Books. 832.

Popper, K. (1994). Vidkryte suspilstvo ta yoho vorohy [The Open Society and Its Enemies]. Vol. 1. Kyiv: Osnovy. 444.

Rawls, John Bordley. (2006). Spravedlivost kak chestnost [A Theory of Justice]. Logos, 1. 35-60.

Sandel, М. (1998). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge, UK New York: Cambridge University Press. 252.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810152

Storozhuk S. (2020). Natsionalizm yak chynnyk protystoiannia sotsialnym transformatsiiam sohodennia [Nationalism as a factor in opposing the social transformations of today]. Humanitarian Studios: Pedagogics, Psychology, Philosophy, 3 (11(4)). 143-151.

http

Fukuyama, Francis. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press. 432.

Published

2021-09-10

Issue

Section

Article