Economic analysis of animal diseases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2022.06.009Keywords:
economic analysis of animal diseases, economic efficiency of veterinary measures, economics of animal health protection, animal husbandry, antiepizootic measuresAbstract
Economic analysis of animal diseases is one of the components of animal health economics. In our country, the scale of the economy of animal health was quite modest. The concept was based on losses (damages) due to diseases and cost-benefit analysis of strategies to control or overcome diseases. This work can be conditionally called an economic analysis of animal diseases and strategies for elimination.
The article has a ground structured component and economic analysis of disease creatures. Each of the components is considered and features are highlighted. In our opinion, the economic analysis of animal diseases primarily includes the economic efficiency of veterinary measures and their components, the saving of labor and material resources due to the use of more effective means and methods of disease prevention and treatment of animals, savings in related industries, strategy, forecasting and modeling of veterinary measures.
Economic analysis of animal diseases makes it possible to determine the profitability of specific disease control programs and animal health management. The impact of animal diseases in the production system (animal husbandry of different levels) consists in reducing the profitability and results of production activities. The consequences of the disease can be divided into two groups: direct and indirect losses.
References
Ababneh M. (2003). Surveillance, Diagnosis and Control of 470 Brucellosis. Economic impact of small ruminant brucellosis; the regional Training Workshop: Amaan, Jordon. Pp. 67-70.
Anteneha Е. (1991). The financing and staffing of livestock services in sub–Sahara Africa, across country analysis. Working Document No. 16. International Livestock.
Bennett R. M. (2003). The direct costs of livestock disease: the development of a system of models for the analysis of 30 endemic livestock diseases in Great Britain. Journal of Agricultural Economics 54, 55–72.
Carpenter T. E. (1980). Economic evaluation of Mycoplasma meleagridis infection in turkeys: I. Production losses. II. Feasibility of eradication. Dissertation Abstracts International 41B(2), 485.
Dijkhuizen A.A., Morris R.S. (eds) (1997) Animal Health Economics: Principles and Applications. University of Sydney, Postgraduate Foundation in Veterinary Science, Sydney, Australia.
Ellis, P.R., James, A.D. and Shaw, A.P.M. (1977). Studies on the Epidemiology and Economics of Swine Fever Eradication in the EEC. EUR 5738, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 90 pp.
Healthy animals, happy farmers! Ofitsiyniy sayt FAO. URL: https://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/CA2348UK/ (data zvernennya 27.11.2022).
Helena Hansson (2019). Modelling animal health as a production factor in dairy production – a case of Swedish dairy agricultureAdvanced level Agricultural Programme- Economics and Manegment Degree thesis No 1189 ISSN 1401-4084 Uppsala 2019
Hugh-Jones M.E., Ellis P.R. and Felton M.R. (1975). An Assessment of the Eradication of Bovine Brucellosis in England and Wales. Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Reading, Reading, UK, 75 pp.
McInerney J.P. (1996). Old economics for new problems – livestock disease: presidential address. Journal of Agricultural Economics 47(3), 295–314.
Mlangwa J.E.D. and Samui K.L. (1996) The nature of animal health economics in relation to veterinary epidemiology. Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 1996, 15 (3), 797-812
Zhukovskyi M. O., Nedosekov V. V. (2021). Introduction to the economics of animal health in ukraine. Ukrayinskiy chasopis veterinarnih nauk, 2021, Tom 12 №3. http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php/Veterenarna/article/view/ ujvs2021.03.008
Morris R.S. (1999). The application of economics in animal health programmes: a practical guide. Rev, sci. tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 18(2), 305-314
Otte M. J., Roland-Holst D., Pfeiffer D., Soares-Magalhaes R., Rushton J., Graham J. and Silbergeld E. (2007). Industrial Livestock Production and Global Health Risks. Research Report, FAO-PPLPI, Rome, Italy, with Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Maryland, University of California, California and RVC, London.
Perry B., Randolph T.F., McDermott J.J., Sones K.R. and Thornton P.K. (2002). Investing in Animal Health Research to Alleviate Poverty. ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya, 140 pp.
Ramsay G., Harrison S.R. and Tisdell C. (1999). Assessing the value of additional animal health information. In: Sharma, P. and Baldock, C. (eds) Understanding Animal Health in Southeast Asia. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia, pp. 260–281.
Rushton J. (2006). Animal health systems and status – Are they trade barriers or mechanisms to improve global animal disease control In: Proceedings of the International Agricultural Trade and Research Consortium Summer Symposium Held in Bonn, Germany 28–30 May 2006. Available at: http://www.ilr.uni-bonn.de/iatrc/iatrc_program/Session%202/J%20Rushton.pdf
Stott A.W. (2005). Costs and benefits of preventing animal diseases: a review focusing on endemic diseases. Report to SEERAD under Advisory Activity 211. Available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/environment/cbpad-00.asp
Tisdell C. (1995). Assessing the Approach to Cost–Benefit Analysis of Controlling Livestock Diseases of McInerney and Others. Paper No. 3 of Research Papers and Reports in Animal Health Economics, University of Queensland, Australia, 22 pp.
Zhukovskyi M. O., Misnichenko V. I., Nedosekov V. V. (2016). Analiz mizhnarodnogo dosvidu finansuvannya protiepizootichnih zahodiv / Naukovi dopovidi Natsionalnogo universitetu bioresursiv i prirodokoristuvannya Ukrayini. 1 (58). URL: http://nd.nubip.edu.ua/2016_1/index.html (data zvernennya 2.11.2021 r.).
Zhukovskyi M. O., Nedosekov V. V., Perotska L. V., Pivovarova I. V. (2019). Dosvid krayin ES u fInansuvannI protiepizootichnih zahodiv ta kompensatsiy za emerdzhentnih situatsiy. Agrarniy visnik Prichornomor’ya. C. 58–66.31.
Zhukovskyi, M. (2019). International veterinary organizations. Scientific reports of NULES of Ukraine, 0(6(82)). http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2019.06.018
Zhukovskiy M., Nedosekov V. (2021). Osnovi ekonomiki ohoroni zdorov'ya tvarin. naukovi dopovidi natsionalnogo universitetu bioresursiv i prirodokoristuvannya Ukrayini. No6 (94). http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2021.06.01323.
Zhukovskyi M. (2018). Finansuvannya protiepizootichnih zahodiv v krayinah ES. Mozhlivosti dlya Ukrayini. Naukovi dopovidi Natsionalnogo universitetu bioresursiv i prirodokoristuvannya Ukrayini. #6 (33). http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2018.06.024
Zhukovskyi M. O., Nedosekov V. V. (2021). Evolyutsiya ekonomiki zdorov'ya tvarin. Naukovi dopovidi Natsionalnogo universitetu bioresursiv i prirodokoristuvannya Ukrayini. #3 (91). http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2021.03.008
Makovska I., Zhukovskyi M., Nedosekov V. (2020). Ekonomichni aspekti preventsiyi skazu tvarin. Naukovi dopovidi Natsionalnogo universitetu bioresursiv i prirodokoristuvannya Ukrayini. #6 (88). https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2020.06.016
Marmul L. O., AranchIy Ya. S. (2014). Metodologichni aspekti viznachennya ekonomIchnoyi efektivnosti veterinarnoyi diyalnosti u tvarinnitstvi. Ekonomika APK. № 9 S. 14
Nedosekov, V., & Zhukovskyi, M. (2017). System of funding anti-epizootic measures and epizootic welfare of Ukraine. Scientific reports of NULES of Ukraine, 0(4(68)). http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2017.04.020
Nedosekov V., Haunhorst E., Sitnik V., Shevchuk V., Zhukovskyi M. (2019). Organizatsiya ta ekonomika veterinarnoyi spravi: navch. posibnik. Kiyiv: NUBIP Ukrayini, 408s.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
