Technology of dialogic interaction as a means of fostering polyculturalism with future foreign language teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog13(3).2022.103-111Abstract
The paper aims to emphasize the importance of educational technology connected with dialogic interaction under the communicative approach in the methodological apparatus for fostering and cultivating polyculturalism among master students, who train to become foreign language teachers / instructors in future. The concept and technology of dialogic interaction is interpreted as a variety in the humanities-oriented technologies and a means of social organization and interaction between man and the world around. Such understanding allows peoples as ethnic group representatives and individuals to express their personal attitude to the surrounding world and regulate the nature of such relations with the world, whether it is man’s interaction with nature, technology, information, people, themselves. It is agreed with the generally known idea that the study of several foreign languages is the key to a successful career of a qualified specialist, which is always in demand in the labor market, inasmuch able to work effectively in the specialty at the level of globally set standards. In the course of study, it is found and verified that today at the stage of foreign language(s) acquisition, the process of fostering and cultivating poly- / multiculturalism with master students, who are training to be future teachers of foreign languages, should be implemented as a purposeful systematic activity that implements a number of functions. These functions are cultural and comparative, value-forming, and socially integrative, and aim at achieving professional development and sociocultural skills of master students, who will make into foreign language teachers / instructors. The findings lead to conclude that the technology of dialogic interaction is considered an effective means of fostering polyculturalism with future teachers / instructors of foreign language(s) in the process of learning such foreign languages at university. Consequently, the technology of dialogic interaction appears as a set of forms, tools and techniques that is ensured via a combination of linguistic and cultural practice along with other activities. Such activities are supposed to include each and vary from informational, cognitive, value-oriented to artistic and aesthetic activities.
References
Amelina, S.M., Tarasenko, R.O., & Azaryan, A.A. (2019). Information and technology case as an indicator of information competence level of the translator. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2433, 266–278. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2433/paper17.pdf
Androsovych, K.A., Rudyk, Ya. M., Melnyk, M.Yu., Kovalova, O.A., & Yakymova, I.O. (2021). Psychological Guidance of the Socialisation Process of Gifted Students Using Information and Communications Technology Means. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment 9 (2), 236-246. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2021.09.02.11.
Caruana, S., Pace, M. (2021). Italian nationals in Maltese schools: a case of 'so near but yet so far'? Review of Educational Research, 15(2), 145-164. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356460088
Chaika, O., Chahrak, N., Zhumbei, M., Apelt, H., Kopchak, L., & Litvinova, A. (2021). Pedagogical framework for poly / multicultural education of foreign language students seeking a degree in teaching. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), 605-616. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2618.
Chaika, O., Polishchuk, O., Honcharuk, L., Hutyriak, O., & Kolodina, L. (2022). Poly- / Multicultural Education of Future Foreign Language Teachers in a Crosscultural Multilingual Environment. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 122-128. http://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/120126/papers/A_21.pdf
Chaika, O., Savytska, I., Sharmanova, N., Zakrenytska, L. (2021). Poly- and/or multiculturality of future teachers in foreign language instruction: methodological facet. WISDOM, 4(20), 126-138. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v20i4.583.
Charte européenne du plurilinguisme (2005). Paris. OEP. 9 p.
Dyman, T. M., Bonkovskyy, O. A., Vovkohon, A. H. (2017). Yevropeyskyy prostir vyshchoyi osvity ta Bolonskyy protses [European space of higher education and the Bologna process]. Odesa.
Gillies, R.M. (2016). Dialogic interactions in thecooperative classroom. International Journal ofEducational Research, Volume 76, pp. 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.009
Haidukova, L.F. (2008). Formuvannia profesiyno-oriyentovanoyi kompetentsiyi v dialohichnomu movlenni u maybutnikh uchyteliv anhliyskoyi movy [Formation of professionally oriented competence in dialogic speech by future English teachers]: avtoref. dys. kand. ped. nauk: spets. 13.00.02. Kyiv.
Krimpas, P.G. (2021). It's all Greek to me: Missed Greek Loanwords in Albanian. Open Journal for Studies in Linguistics, 4(1), 23-34. DOI: 10.32591/coas.ojsl.0401.03023k
Mysechko, O. Ye. (2005). Rozvytok kulturolohichnoho komponenta v zmisti profesiynoyi pidhotovky maybutnʹoho vchytelya inozemnoyi movy [Development of culturological component in the content of professional training of future foreign language teachers]. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu im. Ivana Franka, Vol. 24, s. 97-101.
Myshak, O. (2019). English Neologisms of Biotechnology Sphere. Cogito Multidisciplinary research Journal, 11 (2), 198-210. https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85074583062&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f.
Nikitina, N.P. (2014). Kulturoznavcha sotsializatsiya movnoyi osvity [Cultural socialization of language education]. Science and Education: A New Dimension. Pedagogy and Psychology, II (16), Issue 33. Retrieved from: www.seanewdim.com
Ozadovska, L. V. (2001). Paradyhma dialohichnosti v suchasnomu myslenni [Paradigm of dialogicity in modern thinking]. Kyiv.
Pace, M. (2021). Language Learning and VocationalEducation and Training. Conference Proceedings:Innovation in Language Learning, 14th Edition, pp. 233–239. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356459874
Piekhota, O.M. et al. (2001). Osvitni tekhnolohiyi [Educational technologies]. Kyiv.
Safonova, V.V. (1996). Izucheniye yazykov mezhdunarodnogo obshcheniya v kontekste dialoga kultur i tsivilizatsiy [Studying the languages of international communication in the context of the dialogue of cultures and civilizations]. Voronezh.
Shevchenko, H. P. (2004). Dukhovnist i tsinnosti zhyttya [Spirituality and values of life]. Dukhovnist osobystosti: metodolohiya, teoriya i praktyka [Spirituality of personality: methodology, theory and practice]. Luhansʹk: Vyd-vo Skhidnoukr. nats. un-tu im. V. Dalya.
Siaska, N.V. (2015). Navchannia inozemnoyi movy maybutnikh uchyteliv u konteksti dialohu kultur ta oriyentatsiyeyu na mizhkulturnu komunikatsiyu [Teaching a foreign language to future teachers in the context of intercultural dialogue and focus on intercultural communication]. Visnyk Natsionalnoyi akademiyi Derzhavnoyi prykordonnoyi sluzhby Ukrayiny. Seriya: Pedahohika, Vol. 4. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnadped_2015_4_17
Sidash, N., Roganova, M., Domina, V., Victorova, L.,Roganov, M., Miroshnichenko, V. (2020). PedagogicalConsciousness Formation of Future University Educatorsin the Process of Teaching English. Universal Journal ofEducational Research, 8(4), pp. 1202 – 1211. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080410
Sysoyeva, S.O. (ed.) (2001). Pedahohichni tekhnolohiyi u neperervniy profesiyniy osviti [Pedagogical technologies in continuous professional education]. Kyiv.
Tadeyeva, M. (2009). Bilinhvizm v movniy osviti yevropeyskykh krayin: dosyahnennya i problem [Bilingualism in the language education of European countries: achievements and problems]. Naukovi zapysky TNPU im. V. Hnatyuka. Pedahohika, 1, 111-115. Ternopil.
Tarnopolskyy, O.B. (2006). Metodyka navchannya inshomovnoyi movlennyevoyi diyalnosti u vyshchomu movnomu zakladi osvity [Methods of teaching foreign language speech in higher language education]. Kyiv.
Vrikki, M., Kershner, R., Calcagni, E., Hennessy, S.,Lee, L., Estrada, N., Hernбndez, F., and Ahmed, F. (2018).The teacher scheme for educational dialogue analysis (T-SEDA): developing a research-based observation tool forsupporting teacher inquiry into pupils’ participation inclassroom dialogue, International Journal of Research& Method in Education, 42 (2), pp. 185–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1467890
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
