Features of evidence of cybercrime

Authors

  • Halyna Muliar Academy of Labour, Social Relations and Tourism , Academy of Labour, Social Relations and Tourism
  • Oleksii Khovpun Academy of Labour, Social Relations and Tourism , Academy of Labour, Social Relations and Tourism

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/law2019.03.017

Abstract

The article deals with the issue of collecting, using and using evidence in proving crimes committed through the Internet (cybercrime). Particular attention is paid to carrying out a comprehensive, complete, objective and prompt pre-trial investigation into criminal proceedings for committing cybercrime, collecting and securing all necessary evidence, preserving the legal properties of evidence, and subsequently establishing the presence or absence of a person's fault. The stage of the process of proof (collection, verification and evaluation of evidence) of cybercrime and the possible difficulties that the investigator / prosecutor may face during the investigation is considered in stages. Establishing the necessity of carrying out investigative (search) actions and secret investigative (search) actions, carrying out of expert assessments, involving experts and specialists for consultations, application of measures for ensuring criminal proceedings and establishing international cooperation aimed at bringing the perpetrators to criminal responsibility for cybercrime. Particular attention is given to persons who commit cybercrime, since the latter have a rather high intellectual level and possess knowledge and skills in the use of computer technologies and programs.

Keywords: evidence, proofing process, cybercrime, cybercrime, investigation, criminal proceedings

References

Burbelo, B.A. (2013). Kryminalistychni osnovy protydii kiberzlochynnosti. Aktualni pytannia rozsliduvannia kiberzlochyniv [Forensic Foundations for Countering Cybercrime. Current Issues in the Investigation of Cybercrime]. Kharkiv: Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav, 179–182.

Zakhody zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia. Zrazky ta blanky protsesualnykh dokumentiv [Measures to ensure criminal proceedings. Samples and forms of procedural documents] (2018). Kyiv: «Tsentr uchbovoi literatury», 160.

Kabmin proponuie posylyty vidpovidalnist za kiberzlochyny u sferi krytychnoi informatsiinoi infrastruktury [The Cabinet of Ministers proposes to strengthen responsibility for cybercrime in the field of critical information infrastructure]. Available at: https://ua.interfax.com.ua.

Konventsiia pro kiberzlochynnist [Convention on Cybercrime] (2005): Zakon Ukrainy 07.09.2005 2824-IV. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua.

Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy: chynne zakonodavstvo iz zminamy ta dopovnenniamy na 18.02.2016 [The Criminal Code of Ukraine: current legislation with amendments and supplements. on February 18, 2016] (2016). Kyiv: Alerta, 202.

Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [The Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine] (2018): stanom na 06.07.2018. Kharkiv: Pravo, 366.

Stratehiia rozvytku systemy Ministerstva vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy do 2020 [Strategy of development of the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine up to 2020]. Available at: https://cyberpolice.gov.ua/strategy-2020.

Teoriia sudovykh dokaziv v pytanniakh ta vidpovidiakh [Theory of evidence in questions and answers] (2018). L.D., Udalova, D.P., Pysmennyi, Yu.I., Azarov ta in. Kyiv: «Tsentr uchbovoi literatury», 104.

Published

2019-06-24

Issue

Section

Criminal Law and Criminal Process