Framework approach as a strategy for research and design of complex spatial information systems (Using the example of NGDI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2025.01.09Keywords:
Atlas Geoinformation System (AGIS), AtlasSF Framework approach, NGDI, NSDI, NSpAI, NSII, IGIF, INSPIREAbstract
The so-called Framework approach to the research and design of complex spatial information systems (SpIS) is considered. An example of such a SpIS is the National Geospatial Data Infrastructure (NGDI) of Ukraine in the sense documented as of the end of 2024 in the Law of Ukraine and in the Terms of Reference for the geoportal. Due to the ambiguity of the term, it is advisable to consider the approach from three points of view (interpretations). In this paper, attention is paid to one of these three points of view - the approach as a strategy. This strategy, as well as the Framework approach itself, are called constructive, because they are based on the so-called Conceptual Framework and Solutions Framework (SoFr) of the SpIS. According to the authors, the proposed strategy will solve the most important problem of the NGDI today - the actual lack of a strategy. In addition, the Framework approach will help solve the three biggest problems of the NGDI today: product, process and expertise (quality control).
In the domains of NGDI and NSII (National Spatial Information Infrastructure) and in their contexts, the most important are three points of view (interpretations) on the Framework approach: 1) as a specific constructive strategy for using geographic information systems and technologies (GIS&T) to manage the territory of Ukraine; 2) as a generalization of the methodology for dealing with SpIS such as NGDI and NSII; 3) as a γ-method, which is denoted by γSoFr, where γ means general, and which “works” at the level (stratum) of IGIM (Integrated Geospatial Information Framework) for Ukraine. The limitations of the article allow us to dwell in more detail only on the consideration of the first interpretation. The second and third interpretations are only formulated for general understanding and with the expectation of sufficiency for conscious planning of the NGDI project.
One of the concretizations of the Framework approach is the so-called “AtlasSF Framework Approach”. It is a generalization of the AtlasSF method and tool (Atlas Solutions Framework), which were previously used to create (classical) Atlas systems (AtS). The AtlasSF Framework approach is a hierarchy of three homogeneous Solutions Framework (SoFr) methods. They are called General (γ), Conceptual (β) and Application (α) SoFr, respectively, and are combined into a hierarchical system (model) - Conceptual Framework of the subject X, where X, in addition to AtS, can take the values of NGDI or NSII.
The Framework approach in the NGDI project is proposed to be used as follows. The first problem – the product – is solved by harmonizing the model of the existing NSII of Ukraine with the INSPIRE model. To make this proposal constructive, the concept of Atlas GIS (AGIS, AGIS-CH) and the currently known implementations of its parts, proven in solving Cultural Heritage problems, are recommended for describing the necessary systems.
The second problem – process – is solved by using the AtlasSF Framework approach. The specifics are the application of the γ-, β-, and α- SoFr methods of this approach. The not yet created γSoFr method should be a meta-method of βSoFr, working at the level (stratum) to which the IGIF projection for Ukraine belongs. The IGIF projection includes the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) and its subset NGDI, βSoFr is an update of the GeoSolutions Framework, and αSoFr is the current revision of AtlasSF1.0+.
The third problem – expertise (quality control) of key solutions – is solved by using the V-model of development, in which validation and verification of solutions must be immediately consistent with the requirements and architecture. In addition, the use of architectural patterns (frameworks) is a “native” property of the pattern. Otherwise, the pattern cannot be a “typical solution to a typical problem”.
Keywords: Atlas Geoinformation System (AGIS), AtlasSF Framework approach, NGDI, NSDI, NSpAI, NSII, IGIF, INSPIRE.
References
1. Dyshlyk, O., Chabaniuk, V. (2025). Pro praktyku harmonizatsii IPI Ukrainy z INSPIRE [Text]. In Suchasni dosiahnennia heodezychnoi nauky ta vyrobnytstva. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Zakhidnoho heodezychnoho tovarystva UTGK (Vol. I (49), 12 p. In print. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky.
2. TZNIGD. (2022). Stvorennia Natsionalnoho Geoportalu NIGD. Tekhnichne zavdannia [Elektronnyi resurs]. Derzhavna sluzhba Ukrainy z pytan heodezii, kartohrafii ta kadastru. Available at: https://bit.ly/3QiGNIH.
3. Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building [Text]. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Chabaniuk, V. (2018). Relatsiina kartohrafiia: Teoriia ta praktyka [Text]. Kyiv: Instytut heohrafii NAN Ukrainy.
5. Chabaniuk, V., & Dyshlyk, O. (2024). Onovlennia Kontseptualnoho Karkasa Atlasnykh System [Text]. Zemleustrii, kadastr i monitorynh zemel, (2), 33.
6. Chabaniuk, V., & Dyshlyk, O. (2024). Formalizatsiia Kontseptualnoho Karkasa Prostorovykh System [Text]. Zemleustrii, kadastr i monitorynh zemel, (3), 35.
7. Chabaniuk, V. (2021). Atlas Solutions Framework as a method of the renewed Model-cognitive conception of cartography [Text]. Ukrainian Geographic Journal, (3), 31-40.
8. McKenney, M., & Schneider, M. (2016). Map Framework. A Formal Model of Maps as a Fundamental Data Type in Information Systems [Text]. Springer.
9. Chabaniuk, V. (2024). Karkas Atlasnykh Rishen AtlasSF yak pidkhid, metod i zasib stvorennia Atlasnykh i GeoInformatsiinykh System [Text]. In IV Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., Pereiaslav, 19-20 ver. 2024 r. (pp. 177-181). Pereiaslav (Kyiv. obl.).
10. Chabaniuk, V., & Dyshlyk, O. (2021). Natsionalna Infrastruktura Prostorovykh Danikh (NIPD) Ukrainy: Yakymy ye yii aktualna, zdiisnenna i odnotsasno "pravylnna" modeli? [Text]. Zemleustrii, kadastr i monitorynh zemel, (3), 104-123.
11. Chabaniuk, V., & Dyshlyk, O. (2023). Do pytannia stratehii vykorystannia heoinformatsiinykh system i tekhnolohii dlia upravlinnia terytoriieiu [Text]. Zemleustrii, kadastr i monitorynh zemel, (3), 110-130.
12. Fernandez, J., & Hernandez, C. (2019). Practical Model-Based Systems Engineering [Text]. Artech House.
13. Holt, J. (2023). Systems Engineering Demystified: Apply modern, model-based systems engineering techniques to build complex systems [Text]. Packt Publishing.
14. Falkenberg, E.D., & Lindgreen, P. (Eds.). (1989). Information System Concepts: An In-depth Analysis [Text]. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
15. Bjørner, D. (2006). Software Engineering 3 – Domains, Requirements, and Software Design (Texts in Theoretical Computer Science An EATCS Series) [Text]. Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-21151-8.
16. Evans, E. (2015). Domain-Driven Design Reference. Definitions and Pattern Summaries [Text]. Domain Language, Inc.
17. Chabaniuk, V., & Dyshlyk, O. (2024). Stratehiia Harmonizatsii Infrastruktury Prostorovoi Informatsii Ukrainy z INSPIRE. Systemnyi Pidkhid [Text]. Zemleustrii, kadastr i monitorynh zemel, (1), 155-174.
18. Favre, J. (2006). Megamodelling and Etymology. A Story of Words: from MED to MDE via MODEL in Five Millenniums [Text]. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 05161.
19. Gašević, D., Kaviani, N., & Hatala, M. (2007). On Metamodeling in Megamodels [Text]. MoDELS 2007, LNCS 4735. Springer.
20. Rudenko, L.G. (Ed.). (2018). Kulturna spadshchyna v Atlasnii heoinformatsiinii systemi staloho rozvytku Ukrainy [Text]. Kyiv: Instytut heohrafii NAN Ukrainy.
21. Chabaniuk, V., & Rudenko, L. (2019). Relational geospatial technologies: background theory, practical example and needs in education [Text]. Springer.
22. Cauvin, C., Escobar, F., & Serradj, A. (2010). Thematic Cartography. Volume 1: Thematic Cartography and Transformations [Text]. ISTE-Wiley.
23. Hambrick, D., & Fredrickson, J. (2001). Are you sure you have a strategy? [Text]. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 48-59.
24. Poniattia «stratehichnyi romb» [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: https://strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/hambrick-fredericksons-strategy-diamond/.
25. Martin, J. (1996). Systems Engineering Guidebook [Text]. CRC Press.
26. Scott, G. (2019). The IGIF: Improving and strengthening NSDIs and geospatial information management capacities Integrated Geospatial Information Framework: First International Workshop on Operationalizing the Integrated Geospatial Information Framework, 9–11 September 2019 [Text]. Celso Furtado Conference Room, ECLAC, Santiago, Chile.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
