Geospatial technologies in post-war reconstruction: challenges and innovations in Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2024.03.07

Keywords:

urban renovation, GIS, restoration economy, sustainable development, innovation technology, urban economics

Abstract

Ukraine's post-war reconstruction requires effective strategies to transform war-torn areas into resilient, smart cities, with geospatial technologies playing a pivotal role. Several key scientific methods had been employed for the study, including data extraction and analyses, system modeling and complexity decomposition. This study explores the challenges and innovations in applying geospatial technologies to Ukraine's reconstruction efforts. It examines data accuracy and availability, the integration of ecological and urban planning within GIS frameworks. Key challenges identified include data inaccuracy, technological limitations, and a shortage of skilled professionals. Innovations such as the development of the GIS for Regional Development and integration with the Digital Restoration Ecosystem for Accountable Management (DREAM) aim to address these issues. A sustainable economic reconstruction model is presented, emphasizing geospatial data integration. Enhancing legislation on geospatial data infrastructure and implementing capacity-building initiatives are essential. Effective integration of advanced geospatial technologies and improved legislation will enable Ukraine to meet reconstruction demands, fostering sustainable urban environments and serving as a model for other nations.

Keywords: urban renovation, GIS, restoration economy, sustainable development, innovation technology, urban economics.


Author Biographies

  • V. Nazarenko, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
    Associate Professor at computer systems, networks and cybersecurity department
  • A. Martyn, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

    Corresponding Member of NAAS of Ukraine, Doctor of Economics, Professor

References

A unified geo-information system for monitoring and evaluating the development of regions and territorial communities. – 2024. – Available at:: http://gisrr.mtu.gov.ua. (date of inquery: 03.09.2014).

Koshel, A., Kempa, O., Bavrovska, N., Kolhanova, I., Pashynska, N., Kustovska, O., & Temna, Y. (2024). Scientific approaches to the formation of geo-information support for the management of regional development and post-war restoration of territorial communities in Ukraine. Economic science for rural development 2024, 191. https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2024.58.019.

Novakovska, I., & Bavrovska, N. (2023). Transformation of land and cadastral accounting of the quantity and quality of land in Ukraine in the conditions of post-war recovery. Land management, cadastre and land monitoring, 2, 51-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2023.02.05.

Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023). Ukraine's post-war reconstruction: Building smart cities and governments through a sustainability-based reconstruction plan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 419, 138323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138323.

Makdisi S., Soto R. Economic agenda for post-conflict reconstruction. In: The Aftermath of the Arab Uprisings. London: Routledge, 2023. p. 23–53. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003344414-3.

United Nations Development Programme (2023). Sustainable Reconstruction: A Framework for Inclusive Planning and Financing to Support Green Transition in the Arab States Region. Available at: https://www.undp.org/arab-states/publications/sustainable-reconstruction-framework-inclusive-planning-and-financing-support-green-transition-arab-states-region. (date of inquery: 12.09.2014).

Chen, J., Pellegrini, P., Yang, Z., & Wang, H. Strategies for Sustainable Urban Renewal: Community-Scale GIS-Based Analysis for Densification Decision Making. Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15(10), 7901. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107901.

Baarimah, A. O., Alaloul, W. S., Liew, M. S., Kartika, W., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Musarat, M. A., ... & Qureshi, A. H. (2021). A bibliometric analysis and review of building information modelling for post-disaster reconstruction. Sustainability, 14(1), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010393.

Yakymchuk, A., Byrkovych, T., & Kuzmych, S. (2023, October). Monitoring, assessment and administration of war consequences and post-war reconstruction: remote sensing and GIS economical approaches. In International Conference of Young Professionals «GeoTerrace-2023» (Vol. 2023, No. 1, pp. 1-5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2023510056.

Gyawali, S., Tiwari, S. R., Bajracharya, S. B., & Skotte, H. N. (2020). Promoting sustainable livelihoods: An approach to postdisaster reconstruction. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 626-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2006.00370.x.

Assem, A., Abdelmohsen, S., & Ezzeldin, M. (2019). Smart management of the reconstruction process of post-conflict cities. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 14(2), 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-04-2019-0099.

Belal, A., & Shcherbina, E. (2018, June). Smart-technology in city planning of post-war cities. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. 365, №2, p. 22043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/365/2/022043.

Published

2024-11-26

Issue

Section

Geoinformation technologies for modeling the state of geosystems