Media Discourse Stereotypes of American Subcultures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2020.02.117Abstract
Abstract. The purpose of the article is to present the study of media discourse stereotypes of American subcultures in chronology of their appearance and typological features, that include behavioral, linguistic and fashion peculiarities of subcultural groups.
Methods. To establish the descriptive characteristics of stereotypes of American youth subcultures of media discourse, linguocultural analysis and media monitoring method were applied in the work. Received language material was interpretated in connection with extralinguistic information.
Results. A subculture is defined as community of people whose values, attitudes, interests, and ways of social and linguistic behavior, though related to dominant culture, are different from the latter. Subcultural attributes and rituals, generally hidden from the public, constitute the essential content of a subcultural group. The emergence of the most youth subcultures is associated with a particular music style, that is consistent with the group ideology. Media discourse replicates stereotyped images of subcultures, schematically representing the verbal and non-verbal features of them. In terms of appearance, activity and cultural attitudes, subcultures are divided into types. The article presents the types of American subcultures that have emerged since the 1950s and still exist in the US culture. They include romantic-escapist (e.g, emo), anarcho-nihilistic (e.g, punk, hip-hop), criminal (bandit subcultures), hedonistic-entertaining (e.g, hipster) subcultures. A characteristic feature of subcultures is their slang, which is well known to the public through music and films that function as means of stereotypization of subcultural groups.
Conclusions. Subculture is a unique example of the historical variability of cultural and linguistic systems that fully depend on socio-economic and cultural context. Each subsequent decade of the 20th century after the Second World War in the United States was marked by the emergence of new subcultures that challenged recognized social and cultural standards. The linguistic and stylistic differences of subcultures determine the difference in outlook and values, and lead to their gradations and varieties of them. Appropriated by the dominant culture, subcultural attributes and values have been spread throughout the world through the mass media.
References
Lyubimova, S. (2015). Lingvokulturnyj tipazh ''devushka-flapper'' v amerikanskom diskurse [Lingua-cultural Type ''Flapper'' in American Discourse]. Saarbrücken : LAP Lambert Academic Publishing. p. 304. [In Russian].
Lyuby'mova, S. (2019). Subkul'tura v koncepciyi Styuarta Holla [Subculture in View of Stuart Hall Conception]. Zakarpats'ki filologichni studiyi, 12. P. 243-248. [In Ukrainian]. DOI https://doi.org/10.32782/tps26634880/2019.12.47
https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2019.12.47
Sergeev, S.O. (1996). K voprosu o klassifikaczii i nekotory'kh osobennostyakh molodezhny'kh subkul'tur Rossii [On the classification and some features of youth subcultures of Russia]. Soczial'noe znanie: formaczii i interpretaczii. Kazan': Fort-Dialog, P. 43-50 [In Russian].
Broyard, A. (2018). A Portrait of the Hipster. (Ed. E. Rawson). A Bedford Spotlight Reader. Bedford/ St. Martins, P. 86-93.
Covey, H. C. (2015). Crips and Bloods: A Guide to an American Subculture. Santa Barbara: Greenwood. 195 p.
Dalzell, T. (1996). Flappers to Rappers. American Youth Slang. Springfield, Massachusetts: Merriam Webster. 256 p.
Haenfler, R. (2014). Subcultures the basics. NY: Routledge. 92 p.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315888514
Haenfler, R. (2018). Hip Hop - "Doing" Gender and Race in Subcultures. (Ed. E. Rawson) American Subcultures: A Bedford Spotlight Reader. Bedford/ St. Martins, P. 174-185.
Hendley, N. (2010). American Gangsters, Then and Now: An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, Denver, Oxford: Greenwood. P. 93-97.
Hirschman, E.C. (2016). Branding Masculinity: Tracing the Cultural Foundations of Brand Meaning. New York and London: Routledge. p. 91.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676739
Jawbreaker (1994). Ache. https://genius.com/Jawbreaker-ache-lyrics
Lieske, J. (2010).The Changing Regional Subcultures of the American States and the Utility of a New Cultural Measure. Political Research Quarterly. Vol. 63, No. 3, P. 538-552.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909331425
Luu, Ch. (2015). More Hipster Than Thou: Is Vintage Language Back in Vogue? JSTORE Daily, October 13, 2015. https://daily.jstor.org/hipster-thou-vintage-language-back-vogue/
Thompson, H. S. (2018). Hell's Angeles. (Ed. E. Rawson) American Subcultures: A Bedford Spotlight Reader. Bedford/ St. Martins, P. 117-129.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).