PREDICTION OF STANDS DAMAGE INTENSITY BY WINTER MOTH IN THE LEFT-BANK FOREST-STEPPE
Abstract
Introduction. The base for prediction of the consequences of injurious effect of foliage browsing insects is the evaluation of relations between population density and crown damage. Such index is called critical population density and is calculated by dividing foliage phytomass by feed rate.
Classic prognostic tables, which were prepared by A. Illinsky for the stands of 50 years old and are used in forest protection, do not take into account regional peculiarities of foliage mass and previous tree condition. Now foliage phytomass of the main forest trees is well studied for different natural zones (Lakyda et al., 2010). Therefore it is possible to calculate the critical population density of different foliage browsing insects in different regions.
The aim of this research was the evaluation of winter moth (Operophtera brumata L.) critical population density form prediction the severity of oak stands damage by caterpillars in the Left-Bank Forest Steppe of Ukraine.
Material and methods. Population indices of winter moth were determined by own investigations and publications.
Critical density of the 1st instar larvae of winter moth per one tree, which causes 100% defoliation, was calculated using the data on feed rate for one caterpillar for the whole time of its development and foliage phytomass of oak (Quercus robur L.) in artificial stands of known diameter and height. To evaluate critical population density respective phytomass was divided by feed rate.
It was assumed, that foliage phytomass of weakened tree (the IInd category of sanitary condition) is 0.8 of phytomass of the healthy tree (the Ist category of sanitary condition). Phytomass of severely weakened tree (the IIIrd category of sanitary condition) and drying tree (the IV category of sanitary condition) is 0.4 and 0.16 of phytomass of the healthy tree.
Intensity of crown damage by winter moth larvae was calculated using the data on critical and real population density (larvae/tree).
Results. It is known, that winter moth prefers oak stands of 40–80 years old. Therefore, examples of tables of critical population density of winter moth are presented for trees with diameter 10–36 cm and height 10–28 m. Examples of calculation for healthy and drying trees are presented.
If it is known, how many larvae can cause 100 % defoliation, it is possible to calculate the number of larvae which cause 10, 20, 30 ... 90 % defoliation. The examples are presented for the trees with diameter 20 cm and height 20 m, and obtained data are rounded to integers. It was shown, that depending on initial sanitary condition of trees, their total damage can be caused by 13125 to 2100 larvae of winter moth.
The procedure of prediction of crown damage by winter moth for year n+1 by data of critical and actual population density (caterpillars per tree) is described.
At least 100 trees must be inspected the year n for category of sanitary condition. Critical density of larvae must be taken from the table for trees with respective sanitary condition, mean diameter and height.
Population density of winter moth must be assessed.
If eggs are assessed, their number per branch must be multiplied by number of branches per tree. If the data on egg vitality are absent, it must be assumed 75 %.
If moths are assessed in the trap belts, the fecundity of females and mean egg number per tree is assessed and multiplied by egg vitality.
The example. Average 50 females of winter moth were assessed per one tree, female fecundity is 150 eggs. Then there is 30×150×0.75 = 3375 the 1st instar larvae per tree.
Taking into account mean diameter, height and category of sanitary condition of the tree, one must take the meaning of critical larvae density from the table and compare with assessed larvae density.
For example, critical larvae density is 13100 larvae per tree of the 1st category of canitary condition with diameter 20 cm and height 20 m, and assessed density is 3375 larvae per tree. Than the severity of crown damage is 3375×100/13100 =25.8 %.
If the tree of the same size is drying, than the severity of crown damage is 3375×100/2100 =160.7 %.
It means that at the same winter moth population density, healthy trees would be damaged insignificantly, and drying trees would be all-over damaged.
Conclusions. The tables for prediction of winter moth critical population density of certain diameter and height have been calculated using oak foliage phytomass tables, sanitary condition of trees and feed rate of larvae.
Expected intensity of foliage damage by larvae must be calculated by comparing the table larvae density and larvae density, which is determined from assessed number of eggs or females per tree.
Winter moth (Operophtera brumata L.), critical population density, foliage phytomass, sanitary condition of tress, feed rate.
References
Байдик Г. В. Комахи-шкідники листя дуба у полезахисних лісових смугах ННВЦ «Дослідне поле» ХНАУ ім. В. В. Докучаєва / Г. В. Байдик, Ж. І. Бережненко // Вісник Харківського національного аграрного університету. Серія «Фітопатологія та ентомологія». 2013. — № 10. — С. 22–28.
Бережненко Ж. І. Методичні підходи до вивчення видового складу та ролі комах-листогризів у лісових смугах Харківщини / Ж. І. Бережненко // Матеріали міжнар. наук.-практ. конф., присвяч 80-річчю з дня заснування факультету захисту рослин ХНАУ ім. В. В. Докучаєва (14 вересня 2012 р.). — Х.: ХНАУ, 2012. — С. 19–21.
Бережненко Ж. І. Трофічні зв’язки листогризів з ряду лускокрилі (Lepidoptera) у полезахисних лісових смугах лівобережного Лісостепу України / Ж. І. Бережненко // Вісник Харківського національного аграрного універ¬ситету. Серія «Фітопатологія та ентомологія». 2014. — № 1–2. — С. 15–22.
Воронцов А. ?. Технология защиты леса / А. ?. Воронцов, Е. Г. Мозолевская, Э. С. Соколова. – М.: Экология, 1991. – 304 с.
Голубев, А. В. Математические методы в лесозащите (учет, прогноз, принятие решений) / А. В. Голубев, Г. Э. ?нсаров, В. В. Страхов. – М.: Лесн. пром-сть, 1980.– 101 с.
Краснов В. П. Довідник із захисту лісу / В. П. Краснов, В. І. Ткачук, О. О. Орлов /під ред. д. с-.г. н., проф. В. П. Краснова. – К.: Видавничий дім "Екоінформ", 2011. – 528 с.
Мешкова, В. Л. Сезонное развитие хвоелистогрызущих насекомых /В.Л. Мешкова. Харьков: Новое слово, 2009. – 396 с.
Мєшкова, В.Л. Підходи до оцінювання шкідливості комах-хвоєлистогризів / В.Л. Мєшкова //Український ентомологічний журнал. – 2013. – №1(6).– С.79–89.
Мєшкова В. Л. Чинники мінливості критичної чисельності комах-хвоєлистогризів // Вісник ХНАУ (Серія «фітопатологія та ентомологія»). – 2010. – №1.– С.85–90.
Надзор, учет и прогноз массовых размножений хвое- и листогрызущих насекомых в лесах СССР / ?льинский А. ?., Тропин ?. В. – ред. – М.: Лесн. пром-сть, 1965.– 525 с.
Новак Л.В. Пяденицы в комплексных очагах чешуекрылых / Л.В. Новак, С.Г. Гамаюнова, О.Н. Кукина //Лісівництво і агпролісомеліорація. – 2012. – Вип.120. – С. 133–139.
Нормативи оцінки компонентів надземної фітомаси дерев головних лісотвірних порід України / П.І. Лакида, Р.Д. Василишин, А.Г. Лащенко, А. Ю. Терентьєв – Київ: НУБІП, 2011. – 186 с.
Справочник по защите леса от вредителей и болезней / Г. А. Тимченко, ?. Д. Авраменко, Н. М. Завада и др. – Киев: Урожай, 1988. – 224 с.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).