Allelic polymorphism of microsatelite DNA locі of egg chikens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/poultry2020.09-10.022Keywords:
chicken, cross, microsatellites, polymorphism, DNA, unique allelesAbstract
The analysis of allelic polymorphism of five industrial egg crosses of chickens by five microsatellite DNA loci (ADL0268, MCW216, LEI0094, ADL0278, and MCW248) was carried out. DNA loci were chosen according to the recommendations of the International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG). Based on the results of mathematical-statistical processing and data analysis, the spectra and frequencies of allelic variability, the peculiarities of allele pools, were identified, and unique alleles were identified. In general, the species Gallus gallus is characterized by a specific character of allelic spectra for all investigated microsatellite DNA loci (P <0.001). The highest rates of allelic variability were recorded in brown crosses "Lohmann brown" and "Hisex brown" (Na (LimNa)=(9.2 (5-17) and 7.4 (6-11), respectively). The studied crosses were characterized by a shift in allelic spectra towards a decrease in the fragment length. “Lohmann white” stands out among the birds of other crosses by high consolidation for individual alleles for all studied microsatellites (from ADL278114 – 0.343 and ADL268108 – 0.485 to LEI094259 – 0.720, MCW0248213 – 0.785 and MCW0216137 – 0.920). Unique alleles with the highest frequency were found in brown cross chickens, and in the “Hy-Line W-98” bird, they were not found. The number of unique alleles identified varied from 1 ("Hisex white") to 11 ("Lohmann brown"). Locus LEI094 turned out to be the most polymorphic in terms of the number of unique alleles – 10 such allelic variants were identified for it. No unique alleles were identified at the ADL0268 locus. The obtained estimates criterion χ2 of K. Pearson indicate significant differences in the frequency distribution of alleles for all studied loci. When using the MICROSATELLITE ANALYSER software, it was found that the nature of the variability of the studied microsatellite DNA loci in five industrial crosses of the egg chickens, both in the number of identified alleles and in the nature of their distribution, corresponded to the stepwise mutation model (SMM).References
Agatep, R. C., Lambio, A. L., Vega, R. S. A., Capitan, S. S., Mendioro, M. S. & Yebron, M. G. N. (2016). Microsatellite-based genetic diversity and relationship analyses of three genetic groups of domesticated Mallard ducks (Anas Platyrhynchos Domesticus L). Philipp J Vet Anim Sci., 42 (2), 102-111. [in English].
Borodai, V.P., Ponomarenko, N.P., Melnyk, V.V., Shelov, A.V. & Spyrydonov, V.H. & Melnychuk, S.D. (2012). Informatsiina baza danykh (kataloh) pokaznykiv henetychnoi struktury populiatsii kurei spetsializovanykh yaiechnykh krosiv, yaki vykorystovuiut v Ukraini [Information database (catalog) of indicators of genetic structure of populations of chickens of specialized egg crosses used in Ukraine]. K.: TOV "Ahrar Media Hrup", 20. [in Ukrainian].
Borodai, V.P., Ponomarenko, N.P., Melnyk,V.V., Shelov, A.V., Spyrydonov, V.H. & Melnychuk, S.D. (2012). Rekomendatsii shchodo provedennia henetychnoi otsinky populiatsii kurei spetsializovanykh yaiechnykh krosiv iz zastosuvanniam DNK-markeriv [Recommendations for genetic assessment of populations of chickens specialized egg crosses using DNA markers]. Kyiv.: TOV "Ahrar Media Hrup", 41. [in Ukrainian].
Chen, G., Bao, W., Shu, J., Ji, C., Wang, M. &Eding H. (2008). Assessment of population structure and genetic diversity of 15 Chinese indigenous chicken breeds using microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust J AnimSci., 21 (3), 331-339.
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70125.
Duran, C., Appleby, N., Edwards, D., & Batley J. (2009). Molecular genetic markers: discovery, applications, data storage and visualization. Current bioinformatics, 4, 16-27. [in English].
https://doi.org/10.2174/157489309787158198.
Ewens, W. J. (1972). The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theoretical Population Biology, 3, 87-112. [in English].
https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(72)90035-4.
Gholizadeh, M., Mianji. G. R. (2007). Use of microsatellite markers in poultry research. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6 (2), 145-153.
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2007.145.153.
Hammer, O., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4. 1-9. [in English].
Hariyono, D.N.H., Maharani, D., Cho, S., Manjula, P., Seo, D., Choi, N., Sidadolog, J.H.P. & Lee, J. H. (2019). Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship analyzed by microsatellite markers in eight Indonesian local duck populations. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci., 32, 31-37. [in English]. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0055.
Kimura, M., Ohta, T. (1975). Distribution of allelic frequencies in a finite population under stepwise production of neutral alleles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 72, 2761-2764. [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.72.7.2761.
Loywyck, V., Bed'hom, B., Pinard-van der Laan, M.H., Pitel, F., Verrier, E. & Bijma, P. (2008). Evolution of the polymorphism at molecular markers in QTL and non-QTL regions in selected chicken lines. Genet. Sel. Evol., 40, 639-661. [in English].
https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:2008025.
Maharani, D., Hariyono, D.N.H., Cho, S., Manjula, P., Seo, D., Choi, N., Sidadolog, J.H.P. & Lee, J.H. (2017). Genetic diversity among Indonesian local duck populations in Java Island assessed by microsatellite markers. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genomics, 1 (2), 136-142. [in English]. https://doi.org/10.12972/jabng.20170013.
Novgorodova, I.P., Gladyr', E.A., Fisinin, V.I., & Zinov'eva N.A. (2015). Identifikacija porodnoj prinadlezhnosti kur na osnove mikrosatellitnogo analiza [Identification of the breed of chickens based on microsatellite analysis]. Dostizhenija nauki i tehniki APK [Achievements of science and technology of the agroindustrial complex], 29 (11), 88-90. [in Russian].
Novgorodova, I.P., Zinov'eva, N.A., Gladyr', E.A. & Fisinin, V.I. (2016). Analiz geneticheskogo raznoobrazija dekorativnyh porod kur na osnove mikrosatellitnyh markerov [Analysis of the genetic diversity of ornamental chicken breeds based on microsatellite markers]. Dostizhenija nauki i tehniki APK [Achievements of science and technology of the agro-industrial complex], 30 (1), 69-71. [in Russian].
Ohta, T., Kimura, M. (1973). A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genetical Research., 22, 201-204. [in English].
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300012994.
Peakall, R., Smouse, P.E. (2012). GenAIEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research - an update. Bioinformatics, 28, 2537-2539. [in English].
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460.
Romanov, M.N., Weigend, S. (2001). Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and Jungle fowl using microsatellite markers. Poult Sci., 80, 1057-1063. [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.8.1057.
Sung Soo Choi, Joo Hee Seo, Jung-Min Han, Jiyeon Seong, Jun Heon Lee & Hong Sik Kong (2019). The Development of Multiplex PCR Microsatellite Marker Sets for Korean Chicken Breeds. International Journal of Poultry Science, 18: 492-498. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2019.492.498. [in English].
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2019.492.498.
Wakchaure, R., Ganguly, S., Para, P.A., Praveen, P. K. & Qadri, K. (2015). Molecular Markers and their Applications in Farm Animals: A Review. International Journal of Recent Biotechnology, 3 (3), 23-29. [in English].
Wardecka, B., Olszewski, R., Jaszczak, K., Zieba, G., Pierzchala. M. & Wicinska K. (2002). Relationship between microsatellite marker alleles on chromosomes 1-5 originating аrom the Rhode Island Red and Green-legged Partrigenous breeds and egg production and quality traits in F2 mapping population. J. Appl. Genet., 43 (3), 319-329. [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
