Evaluation of selection material and forecasting of heterosis in the early stages of sugar beet (Beta Vulgaris l.) Plants

Authors

  • O. L. Klyachenko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/biologiya2021.01.003

Keywords:

sugar beet, heterosis, sugar content, productivity

Abstract

To conduct successful selective work aimed at high-yielding sugar beet hybrid creation, it is important to study the source material, its diversity and economically valuable features and patterns of their inheritance. The physiological approach and the development of ways to improve and estimate the population, based on physiological and biochemical indicators contribute to a deeper understanding of the production process. Therefore, the main goal of our work was to conduct a comparative physiological and biochemical evaluation of the production process of different sugar beet genotypes. Research objects were the MS hybrids with different combining ability and inbred lines of the I1 – I4 sugar beet generation. Research methods: physiological, biochemical and statistical. Genotypic features of multi-seeded diploid pollinators by physiological and biochemical parameters of individual metabolic links in the early stages of plant ontogenesis were established and the influence of inbreeding on photosynthetic productivity of plants was revealed. In simple MS hybrids obtained with the participation of combinational (by sugar content) O-type line comparing to one MS tester, a high positive heterosis in PHA and sugar content and a positive correlation between those traits were found. In hybrid combinations created by crossing combinational diploid pollinators compared to one MS tester showed positive heterosis in leaf surface area, chlorophyll content (a + b) and sucrose in the roots.

References

Roik M.V., Parfenyuk O.O. Vikoristannya rekombіnantnikh materіalіv u selektsії batkіvskikh komponentіv gіbridіv buryakіv tsukrovikh za formoyu koreneplodu. Vіsnik agrarnoi nauki 2018. 12 (789). 52-58 https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201812-07/

Orlov S.D., Dubchak O.V. Genetichniy potentsіal z TsChS lіnіy tsukrovikh buryakіv. Tsukrovі buryaki. 2017. 1. 6-8.

Roik M.V., Korneeva M.O. Napryami. metodi ta strategіya rozvitku selektsії tsukrovikh buryakіv. Tsukrovі buryaki. 2015. 6. 7–9.

Balkov I.Ya. Novym etapom v selektsii i semenovodstve dolzhny stat vysokorentabelnyye gibridy svekly. Sakharnaya svekla. 2011. 6. 26-27.

Konarev V.G. Priroda geterozisa i vozmozhnosti ego prognozirovaniya. Selskohozyaystvennaya biologiya. 1991. 3. 3 – 12.

Parry M.A., Reynolds V., Salvucci M.E. et all. Raising yield potential of wheat. II Encreasing photosyntetic capasity and efficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 2011. 62. 2. 453-467. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq304

Suslov V.I., Logvinov V.A., Mishchenko V.N. Teoriya i prakticheskiye aspekty selektsii sakharnoy svekly. Zbіrnik naukovikh prats Іnstitutu bіoyenergetichnikh kultur і tsukrovikh buryakіv NAAN. 2012. 13. 126-131.

Pryadkina G.O., Morgun V.V. Pіgmenti fotosintetichnogo aparatu і produktivnіst ozimoї pshenitsі. Fiziologiya rasteniy i genetika. 2016. 48. 4. 310-323.

Klyachenko O.L. Fіzіologo-bіokhіmіchnі osoblivostі іnbrednikh lіnіy tsukrovikh buryakіv. Agrarna nauka і osvіta. 2004. 3-4. 28-31.

Ctasik O.O., Kiriziy D.A.. Pryadkina G.A. Fotosintez i produktivnost selskokhozyaystvenykh rasteniy. Fiziologiya rasteniy i genetika. 2016. 48. 3. 232-251.

Kiriziy D.A. Fotosintez i donorno-aktseptornyye otnosheniya mezhdu organami kak sostavlyayushchiye produktsionnogo protsessa pshenitsy. Fiziologiya rasteniy i genetika. 2015. 47. 5. 393-419.

Biologiya i selektsiya sakharnoy svekly. M.: Kolos. 1968. 766.

Borisyuk V.A., Klyachenko V.I., Tretyak T.V. Anatomo-morfologicheskiye i fiziologo-biokhimicheskiye testy pri izuchenii selektsionnykh materialov sakharnoy svekly (Metodicheskiye ukazaniya). M.: VASKhNIL. 1989. 67.

Mokronosov A.T.. Borzenkova R.A. Metody kolichestvennoy otsenki struktury i funktsionalnoy aktivnosti fotosinteziruyushchikh tkaney organov. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selektsii. – 1978. – T. 61. - Vyp.3. – S. 199-131.

Fotosintez i produktivnost: metody opredeleniya. [pod redaktsiyey A.T. Mokronosova. A.G. Kovaleva]. – M.: Agropromizdat. - 1989. – 460 s.

Musіenko M.M., Parshikova T.V., Slavniy P.S. Spektrofotometrichnі metodi v praktitsі fіzіologії. bіokhіmії ta ekologії roslin. K.: Fіtosotsіotsentr. 2001. 201.

Pochinok Kh.N. Metody biokhimicheskogo analiza rasteniy. K.: Nauk. dumka. 1976. 333.

Savchenko V.K. Geneticheskiy analiz v setevykh probnykh skreshchivaniyakh. Minsk: Nauka i tekhnika. 1984. 51 – 88.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-17

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Статті

License

Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons  Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).