THE ANSWER OF POPULATIONS HUNTING MAMMAL FAUNA IN PROTECTED BIODIVERSITY MEASURES (FOR EXAMPLE CHERNIHIV REGION)

Authors

  • A. Pavlenko State Environmental Inspection in Chernihiv Oblast,
  • A. Minyaylo National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine,
  • V. Chayka National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2016.04.005

Keywords:

biodiversity, conservation in-situ, nature reserve, elk (Cervuscanadensis), red deer (Cervuselaphus), European roe deer (Capreoluscapreolus), wild boar (Susscrofa), European hare (Lepuseuropaeus), wolf (Canis lupus), red fox (Vulpesvulpes), raccoon dog

Abstract

The last years in the territory of the state it is established increasing of the area of the reserved territories at nationwide and regional levels [3, 10]. At the same time, a question of efficiency criteria determination of nature protection actions and their quantitative reflection, in our opinion, it is left out of sight of scientists and it needs to study. One of methods of biodiversity conditiondetermination and its use in economic conditions of today is system data analysis of monitoring of wild animals functioning in the country being objects of hunting. According to Ukraine legislation, such monitoring is carried annually out by users of hunting lands. It has been established that long-term average values of populations number of a partridge grey and a lepus considerably correlate with MSA index that allows to use debugged monitoring system of these types for control of an ecological condition of surrounding environment in the conditions of South Steppe of Ukraine.

The purpose of researches consisted in the analysis of statistical interrelation between dynamics of the reserved territory and populations number of economically valuable types (objects of hunting) of a region teriofauna.

The research during 1992 - 2013 has been covered about 3 million hectares of various biotopes Polissia and Forest-Steppe left-bank natural zones of Dnieper Lowland of Chernihiv region (it constitutes nearly 90% of the region territory), which as hunting lands are provided in use to specialized enterprises for maintaining hunting economy. The structure of the investigated habitats is altered by man and natural ecosystems and agro-ecosystems. Oncharacter of land use Chernihiv regionis considered as the country agrarian region. During research the agricultural familiarity of the territory constituted about 65%, and ploughing - 44%.

It is established by research that from 1992 to 2013 in the conditions of Chernihiv region at increase in total area of territories and objects of naturally- reserved fund of Ukraine there was a reduction of number and density of populations of elk, red deer, wolf and red fox. At the same time there was an increase in number and density of populations of European roe deer,wild boar, grey hareand raccoon dog. At the same time changes of reserved differently correlate with changes of populations condition of the animal studied types.

So, for 21 observation years it is established considerable, with probability of a mistake ≤ to 1%, direct correlation link of total area changes of territories with the nature protection status and number and density of populations ofa European roe, wild boar and raccoon dog. At the same time, it is established similar on the importance, however the return correlation communication of total area changes of the protected territories and number and density of population a red fox. Lack of correlation communication of area changes of the specified territories and number and density of populations of an elk, red deer, greyhareand wolf is also established.

The main determinants of the regularities determined by experiment, in our opinion, is internally population and external anthropogenic factors, such as biological peculiarities of the researched types, peculiarities of agricultural familiarity of the territory and modern agriculture, and also the level of anthropogenic pressure on predators during hunting.

By determination of efficiency of nature protection actions for creation of the territories and objects of naturally-reserved fund of Ukraine and forming of a national ecological network in the region, it is possible to summarize that during research of their implementation it did not led to recovery of populations of an elk, red deer, grey hare and red fox and, generally, the ecological condition of ecosystems of the region in the context of steady use of a biodiversity has not been stabilized.

 

Author Biographies

A. Pavlenko, State Environmental Inspection in Chernihiv Oblast,

головний спеціаліст

A. Minyaylo, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine,

кандидат сільськогосподарських наук

V. Chayka, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine,

доктор сільськогосподарських наук, професор

References

Doppelmair G. G., Malczewski A., Novikov G. A., Falkenstein B. Y. (1975). Biology of forest birds and animals: [a manual for forestry and biol. specialties universities]. Moscow, Higher School, 383.

Delegan I. V., Delegan I. I. (2005).Biology forest animals and birds.Ed. by PhD agricultural science. Lviv: Polly, 600.

Report on the state of the environment in Chernihiv region for 2013 (2014). Department of Environment and Natural Resources Chernihiv Regional State Administration. Chernihiv, 252.

Eshmen S., Vprydatko V. (2005). What is biodiversity? Agrobiodiversity of Ukraine: Theory, Methodology, Indicators, Examples. Book 1; edited by CJSC “Nichlava”, P. 371-373.

Baker R., Berrouklaf J. F., Belovskoye G. E. (1989).The viability of populations: Environmental aspects: Trans. from English. ed. by M. Suliy. Moscow. Mir., 224.

Zhyla C. (2006). Wolf, wild ungulates and cattle in northern Zhytomyr: selective predation. Theriol school: Fauna in anthropogenic environments., P.160-164.

Kryzhanivsky V. I. (2005). Materials evaluation mammal species richness associated with agricultural landscapes Ukraine. Agrobiodiversity of Ukraine: Theory, Methodology, Indicators, Examples. Book 1; edited by Sozinov O., Prydatko V. Kyiv, CJSC " Nichlava ", P. 114 – 127.

Lushchak M. M., Delegan I. V., Hunczak N. S. (2006). Red fox (VUPES VULPES LINNAEUS, 1758) in Carpathians. Scientific Herald NLTU Ukraine, 38-41.

Movchan Y. (2001). National ecological network in Ukraine. The concept and implementation scenarios. Scientific Proceedings of the National University of "Kyiv Mohyla Academy", V. 19,Part II, 411–415.

National Report on the State of Environment in Ukraine in 2012 (2014). Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine. Kyiv: Ukraine MEP, 416.

Odum E. (1975).Fundamentals of Ecology; ed. by N. P. Naumov. Moscow. Mir., 738.

Prydatko V. (2005). Status of species: wild (hunting) mammals. Agrobiodiversity of Ukraine: Theory, Methodology, Indicators, Examples. Book 1; edited by O. Sozinov , V. Prydatko. Kyiv: CJSC " Nichlava ", 265 – 271.

On approval of the Concept of National Biodiversity Conservation Program for 2005-2025: CMU from 22.09.2004 (2015).Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Official website of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Access:http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=675-2004-%F0.

Rozhenko M. (2008). Powered some wild mammals in anthropogenic landscape of the Black Sea. Theriol school: Fauna in anthropogenic environments, V. 8, 191-200.

Plant: the state of the industry, the results achieved. (2015). Department of Agricultural Development of Chernihiv Regional State Administration. Official website of the Department of Agricultural Development of Chernihiv Regional State Administration. Access:http://apk.cg.gov.ua/sndex.php?id=7830&tp=1&pg=

Sahaydak A., Shkvyrya M. (2002).The role of a wolf in hunting economies of the Ukrainian Polissya. Bulletin of Lviv Univ. series biol., V. 30, 90-92.

Fedyushko M. P., Gorbatenko A. A., Hryb O. (2011). Status indicators associated biodiversity. “Scientific reports” NUBiP.-2011-5(27). Access: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/Nd/2011_5/11fmp.pdf

Shevchenko I. T., Bogatov O. P., Hrippa F.P. (1970). Elements of variational statistics for doctors. Kyiv: Zdorovye,107.

Shkvyrya M. G., Kolesnikov M. O. (2008). Features Wolf Distribution and Behaviour in Ukraine. Zoology Bulletin: Coll. nauk. - tech. works, V. 42, 2, 143-152.

Issue

Section

Biology, biotechnology, ecology