Hybrid control strategies for multi-robot systems: enhancing coordination, communication, and adaptability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31548/Abstract
Multi-robot systems have garnered substantial interest in industrial automation, search and rescue operations, and space exploration due to their capacity to execute complex tasks with enhanced efficiency and robustness. Effective coordination among multiple autonomous agents is crucial for optimizing task execution, minimizing resource utilization, and ensuring operational reliability. However, key challenges such as dynamic task allocation, collision avoidance, communication constraints, and adaptability to environmental changes persist. This study presents a novel hybrid approach to multi-robot task coordination, integrating swarm intelligence principles with reinforcement learning techniques to enhance decision-making and adaptability in dynamic environments.
The proposed methodology employs a hybrid algorithm that synergizes swarm intelligence-based heuristics with reinforcement learning frameworks to achieve optimal task allocation and path planning. The system is implemented in a simulated multi-robot environment, where robots operate under predefined task objectives and varying environmental conditions. The evaluation framework encompasses a series of performance metrics, including task completion time, energy efficiency, inter-robot communication overhead, and system robustness against dynamic perturbations. Comparative analysis is conducted against conventional heuristic and deterministic approaches to validate the effectiveness of the proposed coordination model.
The experimental modeling evaluation reveals that the proposed coordination framework significantly enhances task execution efficiency by minimizing redundant movements and optimizing resource allocation. Performance improvements can be measured in reduced task completion time (by an average of X%), lower energy consumption (by Y%), and improved adaptability to unforeseen obstacles. Additionally, the hybrid approach demonstrates superior resilience in dynamic environments, maintaining stable coordination performance despite task demands and variations in environmental unpredictability. Statistical analysis confirms the robustness of the proposed method over traditional strategies, highlighting its applicability in real-world multi-robot deployments.
The findings underscore the potential of integrating swarm intelligence and reinforcement learning to achieve scalable and adaptive multi-robot coordination. This approach offers substantial implications for real-world applications, including warehouse logistics, autonomous surveillance, and disaster response operations. Future research will extend real-time adaptability, enhance multi-agent learning capabilities, and scale the framework for larger robotic fleets with decentralized decision-making architectures. Furthermore, potential hardware implementations and real-world testing had been explored to validate simulation findings and refine deployment strategies.
Key words: Industrial automation, IoT, Robotics, System Architecture, Control systems, Simulation, Swarm, SLAM
References
1. Chen, J. Y., & Barnes, M. J. (2014). Human-agent teaming for multi-robot control: A review of human factors issues. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 44(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2013.2293535
2. Brailsford, S. C., Potts, C. N., & Smith, B. M. (1999). Constraint satisfaction problems: Algorithms and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 119(3), 557–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00345-2
3. Ryan, M. (2010, May). Constraint-based multi-robot path planning. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 922–928). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509741
4. Song, P., & Kumar, V. (2002, May). A potential field-based approach to multi-robot manipulation. In Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 02CH37292) (Vol. 2, pp. 1217–1222). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2002.1014733
5. Dogar, M., Spielberg, A., Baker, S., & Rus, D. (2019). Multi-robot grasp planning for sequential assembly operations. Autonomous Robots, 43, 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-018-9779-1
6. Farivarnejad, H., & Berman, S. (2022). Multirobot control strategies for collective transport. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 5(1), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-042920-020303
7. Cortés, J., & Egerstedt, M. (2017). Coordinated control of multi-robot systems: A survey. SICE Journal of Control, Measurement, and System Integration, 10(6), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.9746/jcmsi.10.495
8. Marvel, J. A., Bostelman, R., & Falco, J. (2018). Multi-robot assembly strategies and metrics. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3146389
9. Yan, Z., Jouandeau, N., & Cherif, A. A. (2013). A survey and analysis of multi-robot coordination. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 10(12), 399. https://doi.org/10.5772/56927
10. Nieto-Granda, C., Rogers III, J. G., & Christensen, H. I. (2014). Coordination strategies for multi-robot exploration and mapping. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 33(4), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364913507327
11. Neumann, M. A., & Kitts, C. A. (2016). A hybrid multirobot control architecture for object transport. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 21(6), 2983–2988. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2016.2593440
12. Hooper, D. J., & Peterson, G. L. (2009, May). HAMR: A Hybrid Multi-Robot Control Architecture. In FLAIRS Conference (pp. 309–314). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-061-2-309
13. Marino, A., Parker, L. E., Antonelli, G., & Caccavale, F. (2013). A decentralized architecture for multi-robot systems based on the null-space-behavioral control with application to multi-robot border patrolling. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 71, 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-012-9740-9
14. Gielis, J., Shankar, A., & Prorok, A. (2022). A critical review of communications in multi-robot systems. Current Robotics Reports, 3(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-022-00097-6
15. An, X., Wu, C., Lin, Y., Lin, M., Yoshinaga, T., & Ji, Y. (2023). Multi-robot systems and cooperative object transport: Communications, platforms, and challenges. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 4, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCS.2023.3246596
16. Verma, J. K., & Ranga, V. (2021). Multi-robot coordination analysis, taxonomy, challenges and future scope. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 102, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01383-0
17. Chakraa, H., Guérin, F., Leclercq, E., & Lefebvre, D. (2023). Optimization techniques for Multi-Robot Task Allocation problems: Review on the state-of-the-art. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 168, 104492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2023.104492
18. Gu, S., Kuba, J. G., Chen, Y., Du, Y., Yang, L., Knoll, A., & Yang, Y. (2023). Safe multi-agent reinforcement learning for multi-robot control. Artificial Intelligence, 319, 103905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2022.103905
19. Mayya, S., D’Antonio, D. S., Saldaña, D., & Kumar, V. (2021). Resilient task allocation in heterogeneous multi-robot systems. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(2), 1327–1334. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3054562
20. Chang, Y., Ebadi, K., Denniston, C. E., Ginting, M. F., Rosinol, A., Reinke, A., ... & Carlone, L. (2022). LAMP 2.0: A robust multi-robot SLAM system for operation in challenging large-scale underground environments. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(4), 9175–9182. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3187952
21. Li, Q., Lin, W., Liu, Z., & Prorok, A. (2021). Message-aware graph attention networks for large-scale multi-robot path planning. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(3), 5533–5540. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3076798
Published
Issue
Section
License
Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
