Forming potential symbiotic vegetable bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) depending on the application in biologics agrocenoses Right-Bank Forest-Steppe Ukraine

Authors

  • G. V. Pantsireva Vinnytsia National Agrarian University
  • I. I. Palamarchuk Vinnytsia National Agrarian University
  • H. V. Lytvyniuk Vinnytsia National Agrarian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2018.05.012

Abstract

The dynamics of the formation and functioning of the symbiotic apparatus was studied. The influence of new strains of tuberous bacteria on the activity of the process of formation of a symbiotic apparatus in agrocenoses of vegetable bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) was investigated. It is proved that the use of biopreparations provides an increase in interphase periods. The influence of the complex application of inoculation with bacterial preparations Azotofit-p, Biomag, Biocomplex-BTU-1 the basic indices of the symbiotic productivity of vegetable bean crops, in particular the number and weight of active tubers, the active symbiotic potential, and the yield of the bean shovel of the early maturity group of the Zironka variety were studied. The analysis of the number of bulbils and the weight of snap bean showed that the seed inoculation of Zironka sort promoted to increasing the total number of tuberous on the root system of the plant. In the phase of mass flowering, the largest number of tuberous was formed in the variant with the usage of biopreparations Biocomplex-BTU-l – 28,5 pc/plant, which was in 9,3 pc more than the control version. Biopreparations of Azotophyte-l contributed to the formation of tuberous in the amount of – 23,6 pc/plant, which exceeded the variant without pre-sowing seed treatment at 4,4 pt/plant.

The usage of biopreparations also affected on the mass of tuberous. It was the biggest in the variant with application of biopreparations Biocomplex-BTU-l – 0,62 g/plant. The usage of Azotophyte-l or Biomag contributed to receiving a smaller mass of tuberous in comparison to the variant with using Biocomplex-BTU-l, but the indicators were higher in comparison to the control variant. Thus, the application of Azotophyte-l and Biomag contributed to the formation of tuberous mass at the levels of 0,35 and 0,48 g/plant, which exceeded control variant in accordance in 0,12 and 0,25 g/plant.

The general symbiotic potential of snap beans in the Zironka sort determined its dependence on the biopreparations and bacteria which are the part of their basis.

It is noted that the maximum index of the total symbiotic potential of beans is formed during the period of vegetation "mass appearance - budding" with the usage of biopreparations Biocomplex-BTU-l – 1,8 thousand kg. days/ha in the variant without the usage of biopreparations, the magnitude of the total symbiotic potential was 1,2 thousand kg. days/ha, which was less than the mentioned variant in 0.6 thousand kg. days/ha. At the same time, it was noted that the usage of Azotophyte-l or Biomag contributed to the increase in the formation of the general symbiotic potential, where the index was 1,5 and 1,3 thousand kg. days/ha.

With the onset of the next interphase periods, the general symbiotic potential during the vegetative period of the snap bean grew. The regularity between the studied variants in all interphase periods did not changed. Thus, the greatest potential was received with the usage of biopreparations Biocomplex-BTU-l, in particular in the interphase period, "mass appearance - the end of vegetation", where the shown period was the highest and was 26,3 thousand kg day/ha, which exceeded the control variant in 7,3 thousand kg day/ha. The smallest increase in comparison to the variant, where the biopreparations were used, was with the usage of biopreparations Biomag – 20,4 thousand kg. days/ha.

It was established that the magnitude of the active symbiotic potential increased gradually during the growing vegetative mass and vegetation period of snap beans. Thus, during the period of "mass appearance - budding" the active symbiotic potential varied depending on the studied variant. Application of biopreparations Biocomplex-BTU-l contributed to the formation of active symbiotic potential at the level of 6,7 thousand kg. days/ha, which is in 6,1 thousand kg. days/ha more than the control variant. The usage of Azotophyte-l or Biomag biopreparations also contributed to an increase of the active symbiotic potential of the plant. In the interphase period "mass appearance - mass flowering" the index was at the level of 0,7-2,0 thousand kg. days/ha. In the next interphase periods, the increase of the researched indicator was observed.

In the interphase periods, "mass apearance - the beginning of technical ripeness" and "mass appearance - the end of the vegetation," the indicators varied in the following limits: with the usage of biopreparation Azotophyte-l it was 7,9-12,4 thousand kg. days/ha, and with Biomag – 6,6-9,7 thousand kg. days/ha. It was established that the most propitious conditions for the formation of the maximum magnitude of the active symbiotic potential were noted in the variant with using Biocomplex-BTU-l – 10,5-16,8 thousand kg. days/ha, which exceeded the variant where the pre-sowing seed preparation was not used.

On average, during the years of the research the significant impact of biopreparations on the yield of snap beans has been established. The maximum magnitude was received from the variant where the Biocomplex-BTU-l was used. At the same time, the yield was 29,1 t/ha and exceeded the control version in 13,0 t/ha.

Keywords: vegetable beans, agrocenoses, tuber bacteria, symbiotic productivity, yield

References

Anty`pchuk A. F. (1994). Ekology`chesky`e aspekty selekcy`y` ry`zoby`j y` povysheny`e effekty`vnosty` sy`mby`oza [Ecological aspects of selection of rhizobia and increase of the effectiveness of symbiosis]. Fy`zy`ology`ya y` by`oxy`my`ya kul`turnyx rasteny`j, 26 (4), 315-333.

Butvy`na O. Yu., Tolkachev N. Z. , Knyazev A. V. (1997). Vysokokonkurentnye shtammy kluben`kovyx baktery`j – osnova effekty`vnosty` by`opreparatov [High-competitive strains of nodule bacteria - the basis of the effectiveness of biopreparations]. Mikrobiol. zhurn, 59 (4), 123-131.

Volkogon V. V., Nadkerny`cha O. V., Kruty`lo D. V., Kovalevs`ka T. M. (2008). Biopreparaty` na osnovi bul`bochkovy`x bakterij dlya pidvy`shhennya urozhajnosti bobovy`x kul`tur [Biopreparations on the basis of tuber bacteria for increasing the yield of legumes]. Posibny`k ukrayins`kogo xliboroba, 118-119.

Derev'yans`ky`j V. P. (2012). Efekty`vnist` vapnyakovy`x dobry`v, mikrobny`x preparativ ta makro- i mikroelementiv na stijkist` rosly`n do zaxvoryuvan` taprodukty`vnist` soyi [Efficiency of limestone fertilizers, microbial preparations and macro- and microelements on the resistance of plants to diseases and soy yield]. Kormy` i kormovy`robny`cztvo, 72, 68-76.

Mazur V. A., Gorshhar V. I., Konopl`ov O. V. (2010). Ekologichni problemy` zemlerobstva [Ecological problems of agriculture]. K.: Centr naukovoyi literatury`. 2010. S. 34-45.

Metodologiya i prakty`ka vy`kory`stannya mikrobny`x preparativ u texnologiyax vy`roshhuvannya sil`s`kogospodars`ky`x kul`tur [Methodology and practice of microbial drugs use in crop growing technologies] / V. V. Volkogon, A. S. Zary`shnyak, I. V. Gry`ny`k ta in. (2011). Ky`yiv: Agrarna nauka, 153.

Palamarchuk I. I. (2017). Vply`v sortu ta sty`mulyatora rostu rosly`n na dy`namiku narostannya ploshhi ly`stovogo aparatu kabachka v umovax Lisostepu Pravoberezhnogo [Influence of the plant variety and growth stimulator on the dynamics of the growth of the area of the leafy apparatus of the zucchini in the conditions of the Forest-steppe of the Pravoberezhny]. Zbirny`k naukovy`x pracz` Sil`s`ke gospodarstvo ta lisivny`cztvo. Vinny`cya, 6, 32-40.

Palamarchuk I. I. (2018). Produkty`vnist` i dy`namika plodonoshennya rosly`n kabachka zalezhno vid sortovy`x osobly`vostej ta sty`mulyatora rostu v umovax Pravoberezhnogo Lisostepu Ukrayiny` [Productivity and dynamics of fruiting of zucchini plants depending on varietal characteristics and growth stimulator in the conditions of the Right Bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine]. Zbirny`k naukovy`x pracz` Xarkivs`kogo nacional`nogo agrarnogo universy`tetu. Xarkiv, 1, 75-84.

Pancy`reva G. V. (2016). Doslidzhennya sortovy`x resursiv lyupy`nu bilogo (Lupinus albus L.) v Ukrayini [Investigation of the varieties of white lupine resources (Lupinus albus L.) in Ukraine]. Vinny`cya, 4, 88-93.

Pancy`reva G. V. (2016). Pol`ova sxozhist` ta vy`zhy`vanist` rosly`n lyupy`nu bilogo zalezhno vid elementiv texnologiyi vy`roshhuvannya u pravoberezhnomu Lisostepu Ukrayiny`. Kormy` i kormovy`robny`cztvo [Field-like behavior and survival of white lupine plants depending on the elements of cultivation technology in the right-bank forest-steppe of Ukraine]. Vinny`cya, 82, 149-152.

Paty`ka V. P., Ty`xonovy`ch G. A., Filip'yev G. D. (1999). Mikroorganizmy` i al`ternaty`vne zemlerobstvo [Microorganisms and alternative agriculture]. Ky`yiv: Urozhaj, 176.

Pidpaly`j I. F., Ly`povy`j V. G., Pancy`reva G. V. (2015). Formuvannya urozhajnosti lyupy`nu bilogo zalezhno vid texnologichny`x pry`jomiv vy`roshhuvannya [Formation of yield of white lupine depending on technological methods of cultivation]. Agrarna ekonomika. 8 (3-4), 83-87.

Polishhuk I. S., Polishhuk M. I., Mazur V. A. (2015). Efekty`vnist` zastosuvannya biologichno-efekty`vny`x preparativ ta dobry`v pry` vy`roshhuvanni kartopli v umovax pravoberezhnogo Lisostepu Ukrayiny` [Efficiency of application of biologically effective drugs and fertilizers in growing potatoes in the conditions of the right bank of the forest-steppe of Ukraine]. Sil`s`ke gospodarstvo ta lisivny`cztvo. VNAU, 2, 19.

Sil`s`kogospodars`ka mikrobiologiya i zbalansovany`j rozvy`tok agroekosy`stem [Agricultural microbiology and balanced development of agroecosystems] / V. F. Petry`chenko, I. A. Ty`xonovy`ch, S. Ya. Kocz` ta in. (2012). Visny`k agrarnoyi nauky`, 8, 5-11.

“Bacillus simplex – A little known PGPR with anti-fungal activity – Alters pea legume root architecture and nodule morphology when coinoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarumbv. Viciae,” / A. Schwartz, I. Ortiz, M. Maymon, C. Herbold, N. Fujishige, et al. Agronomy, vol. 2013. no. 3. 2013. pp. 595-620.

Albinus M. “Effects of land use practices on livelihoods in the transboundary sub-catchments of the Lake Victoria Basin”. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. Vol. 2. no. 10. 2008. pp. 309-317.

Auxtero E., Madeira M., Parker D. “Extractable Al and Soil Solution Ionic Concentrations in Strongly Leached Soils from Northwest Iberia: Effects of Liming”. ISRN Soil Science. 2012. р. 1-15.

Beneduzi A. “Plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents”. Genetics and Molecular Biology. vol. 35. no. 4. 2012, pp. 1044-1051. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572012000600020

DSTU 4794: 2007. Bean. Growing technology. General terms. K.: Gosstandart of Ukraine. 2009. 10 p.

Figueiredo M., Martinez C., Burity H., Chanway C. “Plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria for improving nodulation and nitrogen fixation in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2007. pp. 1-7.

Figueiredo M., Seldin L., Araujo F., Mariano R. “Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria: Fundamentals and applications”. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2010, pp. 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13612-2_2

Gamalero E. “Mechanisms used by plant growth-promoting bacteria” in Bacteria in Agrobiology: Plant Nutrient Management. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. 2011. pp. 17-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21061-7_2

Hosseinpur A. “Evaluating chemical extractants to estimate available potassium for pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in some calcareous soils. Plant Soil and Environment. vol.58. no.1. 2012, pp. 42-48. https://doi.org/10.17221/314/2011-PSE

Jangu O., Sindhu S. “Differential response of inoculation with indole acetic acid producing Pseudomonas sp. in green gram (Vignaradiata L.) black gram (Vignamungo L.)”. Microbiology Journal. Vol.1. no. 5. 2011. pp. 159-173. https://doi.org/10.3923/mj.2011.159.173

Kots S., Berehovenko S., Kirichenko E. Features of the interaction of plants and nitrogen fixing microorganisms. NAS of Ukraine. Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics. K.: Science. opinion. 2007. 315 p.

Li J., Wang E., Chen W., Chen X. “Genetic diversity and potential for promotion of plant growth detected in nodule endophytic bacteria of soybean grown in Heilongjiang province of China. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. Vol. 40. 2008. pp. 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.08.014

Martyniuk S., Oron J. “Populations of rhizobia in some Polish soils not planted with legumes”. vol. 54. no. 3. 2012. pp. 165-168.

Mohamed Z., El-Sayed S., Radwan T., El-Wahab G. “Potency evaluation of Serratiamarcescens and Pseudomonas fluorescens as biocontrol agents for root-knot nematodes in Egypt”. Journal of Applied Sciences Research. Vol.4. no. 1. 2009. pp. 93-102.

Osoro N., Kawaka F., Naluyange V. “Effects of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [mart.] solms) compost on growth and yield of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Lake Victoria Basin". European International Journal of Science and Technology. Vol. 3. no.7. 2014. pp. 173-186.

Rajendran G., Patel M., Josh S. “Isolation and characterization of nodule-associated Exiguobacterium sp. from the root nodules of fenugreek (Trigonellafoenum-graecum) and their possible role in pant growth promotion”. International Journal of Microbiology. Vol. 2012. pp. 1-8.

Tahmasebpour B., Rezaei H., Aliasgharzadeh N. “The effects of helping bacteria (Pseudomonas spp.) in nitrogen green beans fixation and nodulation with Rhizobium leguminosarumby phaseoli”. International Journal of Science Inventions Today. vol. 2. no. 2. 2013. pp. 556-566.

Watson M. “Understanding Soil Tests for Plant-Available Phosphorus”. Unpublished. 2007.

Published

2018-11-06

Issue

Section

Agronomy