Simplified Monomials in English for Audit and Accounting

Authors

  • O I Chaika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2021.01.093

Abstract

The present paper is work in progress and closely relates to the earlier published works on Ukrainian and English monomials and polynomials in the areas of audit and accounting, law, business. Both monomials and polynomials perform a role of substitutes of the term in linguistics when applicable to terminologies, or languages for specific purposes (LSPs). The current paper looks into the investigation of simplified monomials in English for Audit and Accounting (A&A) according to the morphology class of the kernel term in the monomial structure, on the one hand, and on the other, how the relevantly retrieved data may help trace the trend in monomial coinage and usage in English for A&A, respectively. The simplified monomial in English for A&A stands for a two-term, or bi-term set cluster, which is a basic unit of syntax, represented by two terms (components / constituents / elements) semantically and grammatically connected in the monomial structure.

The introduction will start with the aim, scope of the research and objectives. A brief overview of the terms И?monomial’ and И?simplified monomial’ integrates into Literature Review. The choice of the study material and methodology will lead to Results and Discussion. The latter will present the main findings as based on the classifications adopted for the simplified monomials in English for Audit and Accounting. One of the classifications describes the simplified monomial according to the internal monomial structure. The simplified monomial types are distinguished according to the morphological class of the head (kernel) term in the simplified monomial in English for Audit and Accounting. Conclusion and References will enclose the findings and determine perspective ways of research in future.

References

Alexiadou, A., Iordăchioaia, G., Cano, M. et al. (2013). The realization of external arguments in nominalizations. J Comp German Linguistics 16, p. 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10828-014-9062-x.

Bueriis, G. de, Langella, A. M. (2019). Algebraic Lexicon Grammar. International Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 11, No. 3, p. 21-42. DOI:10.5296/ijl.v11i3.14766.

Chaika, O. (2019). Monomial Variables in English Audit Terminology, International Journal of Philology, Vol. 10, no 1, Kyiv, NUBIP, pp. 100-108. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/philolog 2019.01.100

Chaika, O. (2019). Binomials in English Audit Terminology. International Journal of Philology, Vol. 10, no 3, Kyiv, NUBIP, pp. 68-73. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/philolog2019.03.068

Chaika, O., Zakatei, Yu. (2019). Monomials in English for Law, International Journal of Philology, Vol. 2 (14), pp. 114-121. https://library.udpu.edu.ua/library_files/filologichniy-chacopys/2019/2/17.pdf

Chaika, O., Bambura, A. (2019). Structure of English Business Monomials, Linguistic Bulletin, no 27, Cherkasy, pp. 69-76 (in Ukrainain). https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/339174579

Chaika, O. (2020). Structure of Simplified Monomials in Ukrainian for Audit and Accounting. In: Scientific journal. «International Journal of Philology». Kyiv : «MILENIUM». Vol. 11. No. 4. P.108-112.

Chaika (Čajka), O. (2020). Structure of Bi-Term Monomials in English for Audit and Accounting. In: Euromentor Journal. Volume XI, No. 4. P. 158-174. http://euromentor.ucdc.ro/ EUROMENTORdecember2020.pdf

Chaika, O. (2020). Monomials as Set Term Clusters in Terminologies. In: Scientific journal. «International Journal of Philology». Kyiv: «MILENIUM», Vol. 11. No. 3. P. 96-99. http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php/Filol/article/view/14649

Chaika, O. (2021). Nounal Simplified Monomials in Ukrainian for Audit and Accounting. In: International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, Vol. 4 (2). ISSN (print): 2644-0679, ISSN (online): 2644-0695. P. 578-583.

Darchuk, N. (2019). Compiling of the Electronic Dictionary of Models of the Ukrainian Language Multicomponent Complex Sentences. Ukrajinske Movoznavstvo (Ukrainian Languistics), no 1 (49), p. 117-129. https//doi.org/10.17721/um/ 49(2019).117-129.

Ehrich, V. (2002). On the verbal nature of certain nominal entities. In: More than words. A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, ed. I. Kaufmann and B. Stiebels, 69–89. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

Embick, D. (2010). Localism vs. globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ernest, P. (1987). A model of the cognitive meaning of mathematical expressions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, p. 343-370.

Filloy, E., Rojano, T., Solares, A. (2008). Cognitive ten-dences and generating meaning in the acquisition of algebraic substitution and comparison methods. Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the PME 32 and PME-NA XXX, 3, pp. 9-16. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/273742353

Ivanova, I., Burlakova, V., Pocheptsov, G. (1981). The theoretical grammar of modern English (Teoretičeskaja grammatika sovremennogo ahnglijskogo jazyka). Moscow, Vysšaja škola. 295p.

Gumanová, G. (2016). An Analysis of Term-Formation Processes as Employed in English and Slovak Versions of the EU Texts in the Concept of Equivalence (A Case Study). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313384066.

Norman, F. A. (1986). Students’ unitizing of variable complexes in algebraic and praphical contexts. In: G. Lappan & R. Even (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Pp. 102-107.

Zhao, M.-F., Zimmer, H.D., Zhou, X., Fu, X. (2016). Enactment supports unitisation of action components and enhances thecontribution of familiarity to associative recognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, DOI:10.1080/20445911. 2016.1229321.

International Audit and Assurance Standards, Volume I published by the IAASB – International Audit and Assurance Standards Board. = IAASB as referred to in the publication.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-24