Efficiency of carbon dioxide capture in a rotating packed bed with diifferent absorbents

Authors

  • O. Zabolotnyi National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"
  • A. Solomakha National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/energiya3(79).2025.143

Abstract

One of the effective approaches to reducing CO₂ emissions is the use of liquid absorbents in various types of contact devices, particularly in centrifugal rotating packed bed (RPB) absorbers. This study presents a comparative analysis of chemical liquid absorbents (NaOH, MEA, piperazine) based on mass transfer efficiency, thermal and oxidative stability, regeneration energy demand, and economic feasibility. It was found that centrifugal contactors demonstrate a significantly higher volumetric mass transfer coefficient compared to conventional packed absorption columns, especially when using MEA. The influence of absorbent concentration and hydrodynamic parameters on mass transfer intensity was analyzed. The results show that piperazine, despite its higher cost, provides the best operational performance. The research offers a foundation for selecting absorbents considering both technical and economic parameters as well as mass transfer efficiency, aimed at compact and energy-efficient CO₂ capture systems.

Key words: liquid absorbents, rotating packed bed, CO2 capture, mass transfer

References

1. Comparative Economic Analysis of Physical, Chemical, and Hybrid Absorption Processes for Carbon Capture

2. Wei Zhang, Peng Xie, Yuxing Li, Lin Teng, Jianlu Zhu. (2020). Hydrodynamic characteristics and mass transfer performance of rotating packed bed for CO2 removal by chemical absorption: A review. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 79.

3. P. Tontiwachwuthikul, A. Meisen, C. Jim Lim. (1992). CO2 absorption by NaOH, monoethanolamin and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol solutions in a packed column. Chemical Engineering Science, 47 (2), 381-390.

4. S. Freeman, G. Rochelle. (2011). Thermal degradation of piperazine and its structural analogs. Energy Procedia, 4, 43-50.

5. F. Vega, A. Sanna, B. Navarrete, M. M. Maroto-Valer, V. Cortes. (2014). Degradation of amine-based solvents in CO2 capture process by chemical absorption. Greenhouse gases science and technology, 4 (6), 707-733.

6. Zhen Wang, Mengxiang Fang, Yili Pan, Shuiping Yan, Zhongyang Luo. (2013). Amine-based absorbents selection for CO2 membrane vacuum regeneration technology by combined absorption-desorption analysis. Chemical Engineering Science, 93, 238-249.

7. A. Gul, U. Tezcan Un. (2023). Carbon Dioxide Absorption Using Different Solvents (MEA, NaOH, KOH, MG(OH)2) in Bubble Column Reactor. Bitlis Eren Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 12 (2), 418-427.

8. Majeed Jasim, Dag Eimer, Gary Rochelle (2007).. Carbon Dioxide Absorption and Desorption in Aqueous Monoethanolamine Solutions in a Rotating Packed Bed. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 46, 2823-2833.

9. Y. Liu, F. Zhang, D. Gu, G. Qi, W. Jiao, X. Chen (2022). Gas-Phase Mass Transfer Characteristics in a Counter Airflow Shear Rotating Packed Bed. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 10 (6).

10. Jeffery Kuntz, Adisorn Aroonwilas (2009).. Mass-transfer efficiency of a spray column for CO2 capture by MEA. Energy Procedia, 1, 205-209.

Published

2025-09-08

Issue

Section

Статті