Research methods of imperative discourse on examples of teaching instructions
Abstract
Introduction. The article is devoted to imperative discourse as the source for discovering the mechanisms of successful communication among participants of learning process. The early XXI century is marked by the transition to a new learning paradigm that focuses on lifelong learning. Plenty of available resources such as video lessons, Skype lessons, original multimedia courses, etc. increased greatly the opportunities for learning, shifting the teachers role from the main bearer of professional knowledge and skills to the advisor in the immense pool of learning methods and approaches. For that matter the teacher directs and motivates students for self education and lifelong learning.
On the motivation stage the teacher faces one of the most complicated challenges: how to articulate the right instructions for such demanding and sophisticated students. Lenient, nonintrusive encouragement or tough, dictatorial compulsion will lead to effective motivation nowadays? This dilemma is of current interest, so causative discourse is becoming the subject of research, first of all, for linguists.
The findings of recent research showed that causative discourse has a great potential for eliciting new effective mechanisms for successful communication among participants of learning process.
Purpose. The aim of the article is to summarize research positions concerning causative discourse; outline constitutive features of an instruction as causative discourse; analyze samples of instructions for doing exercises applying inferential pragmatic research methods.
Results. We refer instructions, as a language pragmatic category, to causative discourse as they are associated with the impact of one communicator to another with the aim to perform some (non)communicative actions, change viewpoint, (dis)agree with the opponent, express opinion, etc. Learning instructions belong to neutral imperative acts, that is caused by their pragmatic purpose: to follow instructions willingly, no intrusively, with sufficient amount of presuppositions enough for an addressee to realize and carry out them properly.
In this article we have analyzed some samples of instructive discourse (learning instructions) applying inferential pragmatic research methods, based on the Relevance theory by G. P. Grice and developed by D. Sperber and D. Wilson. The offered research method focuses on the universals of rational language behavior, regularized by Cooperative principle; on learning the Speakers implicated meaning and the rules of its reference by the Hearer.
Conclusion. Research methods of causative discourse, based on inferential pragmatic research model, let identify some possible variants of semantic interpretations of an instruction, elicit its most suitable inference that correlates with implicated meaning and this way guarantee the pragmatic effect of an instruction.
Full Text:
PDF (Українська)References
Vetskur, T. A. (2011). Sekventsiynyi kharakter instruktyvnoho povchalnoho dyskursu (na materiali angliysyskoi movi) [Sequential character of instructive didactic discourse] Nova flologya. 44. 23-28.
Holoshchuk, S. L (2007). Kohnityvno-komunikatyvni osoblyvosti sponukalnoho dyskursu [Cognitive communicative features of causative discourse] Visn. Nats. un-tu Lviv. Politekhnika. 586. Lviv, 56-59.
Holoshchuk, S. L. (2011). Linhvoprahmatychni osoblyvosti sponukalnoho dyskursu v anhlomovniy prozi (na materiali khudozhnikh tvoriv druhoyi polovyny XX st.) [Pragmalinguistic features of causative discourse in English prose]: avtoref. dys. ... kand. filol. nauk : 10.02.04. Lviv, 20.
Holoshchuk, S. L. (2011). Linhvoprahmatychni osoblyvosti sponukalnoho dyskursu v anhlomovniy prozi (na materiali khudozhnikh tvoriv druhoyi polovyny XX st.) [Pragmalinguistic features of causative discourse in English prose]: avtoref. dys. ... kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.04. Lviv, 20.
Kanashchuk, S. A. (2012). Instruktyvnyi dyskurs IT korporatsyi: sotsyolynhvystycheskyy aspekt [Instructive discourse of IT corporations: socio linguistic aspect]: dys kand. filol. nauk. 10.02.01. Tomsk, 227.
Kondrashkyna, E. Y. (2015). Prahmalynhvystycheskaya kharakterystyka instruktsyi na materiale russkoho y serbskoho yazykov [Pragmalinguistic characteristic of an instruction on the materials of Russian and Serbian languages] Filolohicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teoryi y praktiki. Ch. I. 9 (51). Tambov: Hramota, 85-91.
Kravchenko, N. K., Pasternak, T. A. (2016). Metodyka issledovaniya razhovornoho diskursa v rakurse teorii relevantnostiy (inferentsionno-prahmaticheskaya model) [Research methods of colloquial discourse in terms of relevance theory (inferential-pragmatic model)]. Odeskyi linhvistychnyy visnyk. Vyp. 8. Odesa, 40-43.
Kravchenko, N. K. (2017). Dyskurs y dyskurs-analiz: kratkaya entsyklopediya [Discourse and discourse analysis: brief encyclopedia] Kyev: Interservys, 286.
Moshchanskaya, E. Y. (2013). Instruktsiya po ekspluatatsiyi kak zhanr dyrektyvnoho dyskursa: predperevodcheskiy analiz [Service instructions as a genre of causative discourse: pre translation analysis]. Filolohycheskiye nauki. Voprosy teoriiy i praktiki. Ch. I. 7 (25). Tambov: Hramota, 134-137.
Nazmeeva, N. A. (2011). Metodychnyi dyskurs iak linhvistychnyi fenomen u suchasniy dyskursyvniy paradyhmi [Methodological discourse as a linguistic phenomenon in modern discursive paradigm] Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu Ostrozhka akademiya. Vyp. 20. 150-155.
Narushevych-Vasylyeva, O. V. (1999). Zasoby vyrazhennya funktsiyi prokhannya FSP sponukalnosti (na materiali tekstiv khudozhnoho stylyu) [Ways to express request function of FSP causation (based on materials of literary style)] Zapysky z ukrayinskoho movoznavstva. Vyp. 8. Odesa: Astroprynt, 86 94.
Nosova, L. N. (2013). Kommunykatyvno-prahmaticheskiy potentsial instruktsii po prymeneniyu lekarstvennykh sredstv v farmatsevticheskom diskurse [Pragma communicative potential of a summary of product characteristics in pharmaceutical discourse]: avtoref. dys kand. filol. nauk. 10.02.19. Moskva, 24.
Pasternak, T. A. (2016). Intensyfikatsiya protsesu vyvchennya inozemnykh mov [Intensification of the process of learning foreign languages]. Zb. materialiv II Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., 25-26 lyutoho. Kyiv: Milenium, 181-182.
Formanovskaya, N. Y. (1998). Kommunykatyvno-prahmatycheskye aspekty edinits obshcheniya [Pragma communicative aspects of communication units] Moskva: Ynstytut russkoho yazyka ym. A.S. Pushkina, 293.
Franko, O. B. (2007). Semantychni ta prahmatychni parametry sponukalnoho dyskursu (na materiali nimetskomovnykh khudozhnikh tvoriv st.) [Semantic and pragmatic parameters of causative discourse (based on materials of German fiction of century)]: avtoref. dys... kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.04. Kyiv, 19.
Kharchenko, S. V. (2015). Variantnist fakultatyvnykh elementiv semantyko-syntaksychnoi struktury rechen [Variation of optional elements of semantic and syntactic structure of sentences]. Scientific Herald of National university of life and environmental sciences of Ukraine. Series: Philological Sciences, 215, 33-39
Shynkaruk, V.D. Dyskursyvne vyslovliuvannia yak funktsionalno-movlennieva odynytsia (1996). [Discursive statement as functionally-speech unit ]. Zbirnyk Struktura ta semantyka movnykh odynyts u funktsionalnomu aspekti [Bulletin The structure and semantics of language units in the functional aspect ]/ . Chernivtsi: ChDU, 1996. S.180-192.
Shutova, O. O. (2011). Povchalnyi dyskurs: komunikatyvno-prahmatychni ta zhanrovi osoblyvosti (na materiali ukrayinskykh, rosiyskykh, anhliyskykh ta frantsuzkykh folklornykh dydaktychnykh tekstiv) [Instructive discourse, pragmatic communicative and genre features (based on Ukrainian, Russian, English and French folk didactic texts)]: avtoref. dys... kand. filol. nauk : 10.02.15. Donetsk, 20.
Grice, H. P. (1975).Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics. V. 3. NY: Academic Press, 41-58.
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Essays 1-7, 14,
; Retrospective Epilogue. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Sperber, D., Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Cambridge MA.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog0(263).2017.028%20-%2036
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.